i don't get it. why would they have deleted scenes for a movie that DOES NOT exist?
What!!?? Terminator 3 doesnt exist??
i don't get it. why would they have deleted scenes for a movie that DOES NOT exist?
What!!?? Terminator 3 doesnt exist??
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/kayFrIR-Qfw&hl=en_GB&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/kayFrIR-Qfw&hl=en_GB&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
*sigh*
Is T5 even still happening? I thought T4 underperformed and the rights were switching hands again etc etc
Y'know what? I'm ashamed to say it but I did laugh when I watched that again just now - its a great Arnie sequence and probably the last time we'll ever see him looking like his 'old young' self. But its just totally wrong for a Terminator film. A terminator spoof? Sure. But not an actual Terminator film. T3 was too much of a self parody and would have been made even moreso had this scene been included.
I would have loved for this scene to be in the film. I definitely want this to be cannon. C'mon, it has to bring a smile to your face. And Arnie's smile, then serious look is priceless. he movie did have that horrible gay bar pink glasses scene which was funny but really stupid. This at least makes sense if it was included.
That's the point, it makes no sense, it makes no sense with the previous story written by Cameron (this would mean that humans built Terminator, and not Skynet, which is stupid) and also, Terminator isn't meant to be a comedy (bad comedy at it)..
I really hate that scene for what it could have done to the Terminator serial.
Third part should have never existed!
I'm not saying it wasn't a funny scene, it was, it just isn't something that Terminator movie should be!
Every movie is an alternate timeline though, so the creation of the t800 doesn't always occur at the same points in time. Hicks for example going to the past for the first time in the timeline would not have known John Conner until him and Sarah hooked up creating the alternate timeline where John Conner does exist. Obviously John Conner in the future learns Skynet is sending back a Terminator to kill his mother sends Reese because he hears his name and puts two and two together that he is his father. Now the new timeline begins and we see Terminator 1 with Kyle already knowing about John being the leader of the resistance but doesn't know he is the father and never will. My explanation does account for multiple timelines and makes the most sense of all the explanations as to how everything got started. Remember each time someone gets sent to the past, an alternate timeline occurs. In T3, a few Colonels were killed by the Terminatrix wiping them out of existence at the end of that timeline which leads into Salvation. What is unclear is whether or not the Marcus storyline was already occurring, or was that within the same timeline? My guess is its the same.
Though the soldier sounds like he should be black.
I do understand you, and one can go nuts thinking about time traveling, and trying to keep the timeline understandable..
However, I see no logical explanation to why would humans develop Terminator, and looking the very same way that first one sent beck in time looked like.
But I really don't feel like talking about T3 at all
It was really a lousy movie, it was a terrible Terminator movie, but if you try to look at it independently (as a non.Terminator movie), it's a good action movie with a huge plotholes
Nothing more, nothing less..
Bottom point, I'm glad they didn't include that scene, as in my opinion,
Mostow hurt the whole Terminator image as is, it would only make it look even worse!
...it makes no sense with the previous story written by Cameron (this would mean that humans built Terminator, and not Skynet, which is stupid)...
Every movie is an alternate timeline though
Superman said:...so the creation of the t800 doesn't always occur at the same points in time.
Superman said:Hicks for example going to the past for the first time in the timeline would not have known John Conner until him and Sarah hooked up creating the alternate timeline where John Conner does exist.
Superman said:Obviously John Conner in the future learns Skynet is sending back a Terminator to kill his mother sends Reese because he hears his name and puts two and two together that he is his father. Now the new timeline begins and we see Terminator 1 with Kyle already knowing about John being the leader of the resistance but doesn't know he is the father and never will.
Superman said:My explanation does account for multiple timelines and makes the most sense of all the explanations as to how everything got started.
Superman said:What is unclear is whether or not the Marcus storyline was already occurring, or was that within the same timeline?
However, I see no logical explanation to why would humans develop Terminator, and looking the very same way that first one sent beck in time looked like.
Terminator Salvation explains Cyberdine as a private company and Skynet as simply the computer program to control all internet.
whoa looks like it's open season on noobs today, hahahahaha!
i'll pitch in my lil contribution then: it's not john conner, it's john connor, with an "o".
Yes, humans did build Terminators. Cyberdyne made its name off of the designs and programming they reverse engineered from the chip and the remains of the 1984 Terminator which they ultimately developed through military contracts. T2 clearly shows that they have the parts. Not to mention that it's called, by Kyle, Cyberdyne Systems model 101, not Skynet model 101. At least the prototypes, and probably remote controlled versions of them (Skynet A.I. not ready yet), minus cyborg skin; probably with rubber skin, would have to have been already built before the war for them to be called Cyberdyne models, wouldn't they.
Because Cyberdyne was always responsible for making the model 101 Terminator, and the source of its design comes from what was left in their factory at the end of T1. It's a causality loop. Terminator gets sent back. Remains found in factory. Cyberdyne makes Terminator based on remains. Probably get military funding for it and Skynet which is being developed from the chip. Skynet goes online and starts the war. Skynet uses Terminators to hunt down strategic targets in the growing threat of the rising Resistance toward the end of the war. The T-600s (probably as far as Cyberdyne ever got in the design process) are not as effective at infiltration as Skynet needs them to be, so it developes cyborgs from the 600s, making them 800s by way of numeric progression. The Resistance still defeats Skynet, but Skynet uses time displacement to send an 800 after Sarah to make sure John is never born to defeat Skynet. Kyle goes after it. John is born. Time loop repeats, but gets altered by the destruction of Cyberdyne building in T2. Remains to be seen where it will end.
Any questions?
Enter your email address to join: