Yes, see I'm not hearing impaired like you.
Loki was just this guy that was kind of a ****, there wasn't a whole lot to go on with him. His motivations were bland and uninspired.
Loki didn't subjugate any city but he did bring an Alien armada to try. A minor but loved character got killed. He got the heroes to bicker and brawl with each other. Bane subjugated a city for several months. Broke the bat. Killed the mayor. Both teams of heroes won by threading the needle. The scales of the threats were different, but relative to the heroes for each movie, they were pretty even. But I'd say Bane caused more devastation to team Batman than Loki caused to the Avengers. Plus all this henchmen talk irks me when Loki was basically the same to the alien guys. Although, as mentioned, both were pawns to a bigger villain, Bane felt more like the head villain. Throughout Avengers we knew Loki was working for a then, unknown Thanos, and if we forgot, we had a lovely reminder by Thanos' lackey threatening Loki. Bane felt in control the entire time, And while I had a hint thanks to the internet (jerks) that Talia was behind him, it didn't take away from the fact that he was doing all the hard work, planning, and manipulation from the shadows.
It's Bane. He seemed like an actual villain/psychopath and physically looked the part as well. Loki seemed like a condescending, wimpy, nerd at a cos-play convention.
