I wonder exactly how much people complaining about the "greedy" price of the BBTS damaged Batmobiles want them to cost? How much more of a hit to their profits do you want BBTS to take for a problem that they didn't cause?
It's not that they're being "greedy", it's called "running a business". If BBTS bought a bunch of these at a wholesale price from SS (who got them from the manufacturer HT), and now they mark-down the cost because of the damage, they are LOSING MONEY. Is it "greedy" when a consumer wants to avoid losing money for something that isn't their fault? Then how is it greedy when BBTS does the same thing?
Once they bought and paid for their wholesale inventory, and then they mark-down their selling price for the damage, their potential profit margin shrinks. You think Hot Toys is reimbursing them for "reduced potential profits"?