batfan08
Super Freak
It's not being judged on 5 minutes of footage though. It's a sequel to a movie that s lot of people hated.
And it seems from the 5 minutes that we have seen to compound what didn't work in that movie rather than fixing it's issues.
I would imagine a lot of people would be VERY happy if this turns out to be unexpectedly great. Eating crow won't come into it.
Everyone wants a good Batman Superman movie.
How does it compound those issues, though? A lot of what I've seen is them addressing the issues. Wasn't one of the biggest things Superman's carelessness and how he didn't help people? So far, out of 5 minutes of footage, we see him:
-Saving Flood Victims
-Saving a Rocket
...and, as far as the Battle of Metropolis goes, we see it from Bruce Wayne's perspective, we see how that's the foundation of his problem with Superman, and we see that Superman's going to a hearing about it, not to mention all the protesters, the "false god" graffiti, etc. Ideally, they wouldn't be having to apply the narrative fix-a-flat to their Man of Steel sized blow out, but, if we're talking about getting a better Superman movie, I am think of worse ways to get there than by actually addressing the issues of the last film.