Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)

[moose]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

It's funny cause War was based off JL Origin where they originally had Aquaman, and he was way more Badass than Cap Marvel in War, I hope they use AM, and later on add Cap Marvel.

Also, Aquaman also has super strength and is a good strategist, he doesn't necessarily need to be around water to be of help, although, having huge white sharks at your command is pretty badass.

I love Aquaman the king of Atlantis he is one of the titles that I collect and read. He could be DC Thor royalty and stuff.I know they are making a animation

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Regardless of who they use, it was still a really stupid comment for Goyer to make.

It's weird, I expected a huge and indignant backlash.....

The one thing in this franchise's entire history of gossips and rumors that actually deserves a big backlash....

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

I love Aquaman the king of Atlantis he is one of the titles that I collect and read. He could be DC Thor royalty and stuff.I know they are making a animation

Both WW and Aquaman could work as the regal fish out of the water

 

[moose]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Both WW and Aquaman could work as the regal fish out of the water

How to shoot a character who spends time underwater is what I am curious about. Can they do it or not

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

How to shoot a character who spends time underwater is what I am curious about. Can they do it or not

I'm sure they can, also, he spends a lot of time in Atlantis, I'm sure that's easily achievable.

 

[The Phantom]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

It's weird, I expected a huge and indignant backlash.....

The one thing in this franchise's entire history of gossips and rumors that actually deserves a big backlash....

Dig it.

It's not even a case of someone saying, "I heard that......." The guy's on tape saying it, witnesses and everything.

And nothing? Well, not nothing, but not what I would have expected.

Unbelievable.

 

[meanstreak]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

I'm sure they can, also, he spends a lot of time in Atlantis, I'm sure that's easily achievable.

Yep, it could be a better version of where the Gungans lived in Phantom Menace.

 

[Baneofdemon22]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

If Batman and Superman are in it, it doesn't matter. I don't think people really know Flash, or Aquaman either. They younger generation is the big revenue is going to come. Marvel has a raccoon with a gun, before a Wonder Woman movie! I think David Goyer was thinking if they weren't Superfriends, no one cares. Who cared about Green Arrow to have his own tv series, or Blade? I just think it's a weird comment.

 

[Frank]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

I’m on no side, but I’m able to critique things in a more mature way so that I don’t ruin the excitement for the guys who are really looking forward to this. All it does is cause arguments and constant back and forth bickering. Not saying every member here is like that, but some comments do seem intentionally provoking.

If someone's excitement can be ruined on a forum it means they need emotional support to enjoy what they like. My positivity/negativity won't be affected unless someone makes a valid point for me. The worst thing that's ever happened to me on these forums was being spoiled on tons of Avengers stuff, but I know it was my mostly my fault for sticking around the forums... though I reserve special hatred for the hipsters who absolutely need to put the latest pirated footage in their animated sigs! The worst way to see the Hulk-Loki smash scene ever.



We shouldn't shy away from tough criticism as long as it's not character assassination for it's own sake. The word is provocative, and every single open discussion ought to have it. Problem comes in where people identify so strongly with an opinion that any argument against it is the equivalent of a personal attack.

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Yep, it could be a better version of where the Gungans lived in Phantom Menace.

Yeah, exactly what I was thinking

But a much MUCH better version.

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Can you please emphasize MUCH a little bit more, it would make me feel so much better.

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Can you please emphasize MUCH a little bit more, it would make me feel so much better.

a much MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH better version.

 

[Entropy]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

It's weird, I expected a huge and indignant backlash.....

The one thing in this franchise's entire history of gossips and rumors that actually deserves a big backlash....

I thought it was common knowledge that Goyer is a hack d-bag.

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

 

[highlander1]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

 

[GasparZizou]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Uhh that's a nice poster


Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

 

[Silrian]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Wow, nicely done! Your work Highlander?

You didn't know? You're not allowed to enjoy anything. You're actually supposed to "hang out" in a thread relating to a film you absolutely HATED.

So it would seem.

 

[Silrian]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Okay and then someone supplies me this information and I genuinely like the title more because of it:

"I have a legal background. The whole “v” thing, that is an adversarial thing in courts. When you go to court and you’re reading old court cases it’s “Smith v California”. The first name in the title of a court case is the grieving party. It’s the one bringing the grievance. The one saying the first party has a problem with the second party. And that’s the legal way that that’s set up. So when I look at that title, it makes sense that they left the “s” out of the “v” [in "vs."]. Now it makes sense to me. Batman is the one coming after Superman in this film. I have no doubt about that."

https://batman-news.com/2014/05/22/batman-v-superman-dawn-justice-title-really-means/

 

[moose]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Exactly right Batman is going after Superman , but people already know this and frankly irs the same 2 or 3 people who are complaining about man of steel. This is the height of ridiculousness that people are complaining about the title of a movie. But its great marketing the fact that people are arguing sbout a movie that is 2 years away is great for publicity.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk

 

[Silrian]

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

^Ha, true, whatever you want to say about it so far they're keeping discussions alive, that's actually quite advantageous.