Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
Yeah yeah, it's always the producers fault
HE walked from SM4, the reboot was inevitable.
HE walked from SM4, the reboot was inevitable.
Yeah yeah, it's always the producers fault
HE walked from SM4, the reboot was inevitable.
It's the equivalent of comparing LOTR to harry potter
maybe they were either irony votes or Avengers fans votes.
Its what kinda made me sick of the whole thing in the end, too much overhype. Same thing with Iron Man, just sick of seeing him, too much glorification over an okay character.
Well the poll is going well for Spidey huh
Agreed - that's how I feel pretty much.Considering they are 2 trilogies that try to appeal to an audience in very different ways from eachother I find it hard to choose one. Depends on my mood. If I feel like something more fantastical and light I'd go for the Spiderman films, if I want 'realism' and character studies I'll go for the Batmans.
Your words are like a cold shower mate - well said.They both suck.
I'm sick of hearing about them in every thread. Spider-Man this, Batman that, Nolan, Nolan, Nolan. They can all suck it.
You're all worthless nerds stuck on a single obsession.
Close thread.
Eat ****.
You spend too much on toys.
Never happy.
Argue too much.
For you he's an okay character but you have no problems ranting about Iron Man or the Avengers in any thread because what you deem more important isn't getting any love.
Nope, he's just a boring character, okay in small doses until his novelty wears off. With only two decent supporting characters, (WM and Rescue) and lame villains there's not a whole lot there excelt the armour. Doubly so when people try to make him seem better than he is.
Cap and Thor are far superior characters with better villains and supporting characters, but for some reason come second to him
Btw: check current events, i haven't discussed avengers in ages
Nobody knew who ironman was til the movie.
I'm not much of a comic fan, but even I had to click on this thread to see if it was a serious discussion.
IMO, these two trilogies can't even be compared. Nolan's Batman isn't just a great trilogy, they are great cinematic pieces of art. Nolan has a talent very few people in Hollywood have.
If you haven't seen Memento, go watch it. If you have seen it, go watch it again. His brilliance is amazing in that movie. Inception is one of the most imaginary pieces of storytelling I have seen in a long time. Yes, he might have borrowed pieces from here and there, but he crafted it together perfectly.
Sorry, Raimi doesn't even come close. Therefore, Spider-Man has to take a back seat to Batman.
I don't know about that.
Besides Lord of the Rings > HP > Spider-Man (by just a sliver) > Nolan's Batman
Did you really think it would?
Peter David stated in a recent article that Nolan had written Bruce to die in the explosion but WB veto'd it. So the whining about Bruce living happily ever after can at least stop being directed at Nolan. He was going to have him be Batman to his very last breath, not retire.
And honestly the whole "Batman quit, Batman cried, Spider-Man is emo and quit!" is about the dumbest criticism I've heard of a film and nothing I've ever come across outside of this website. Chastizing films because the hero loses his fight, gives up and then is inspired to come back with a vengeance, or lives happily ever after after saving the day. Yeah like a thousand different films haven't employed those themes across all genres. But many here get just as emo if their superheroes don't punch, punch, punch for 120 minutes without any inner turmoil at all.
Nolan Batman > LOTR > X Men > Spiderman > HP
There's a reason Spidey is being spanked in the poll.