ajp4mgs
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
- Messages
- 2,305
- Reaction score
- 1,672
Because uncertain the future is, and the turn/redemption depended much more on Anakin than on Luke. Luke's appeals to his father didn't keep Vader from dueling his son and even threatening Leia to compel Luke to come out and fight (thus, either join him or die). Vader only turned when Luke's death was an imminent certainty.Why not be explicit with Luke - ''as his son, it might be possible for you to do what Yoda and I never could have succeeded in doing - bring him back, turn him against the Emperor''. From the perspective of keeping things a surprise for the movie-watchers I understand why they weren't written to say this, why it was kept vague. But within universe surely it'd make sense to be clear with Luke about what the best course of action would be. Was it like Dr Strange in Endgame - it I tell you what happens, it might not happen.
If you're going to embrace my interpretation that Yoda and Kenobi had at least a glimmer of hope that Luke could bring Anakin back to the light, then you have to believe that Yoda and Obi-Wan also knew that Luke wouldn't win him over with spoken appeals. Something as simplistic as that would've been turning darksiders back to the light with ease all along, as surely Anakin wasn't the first Jedi to fall. Instead, Anakin would be brought back by not being willing to allow his son to fall as he did, or to be killed.
But Yoda's admonition that always in motion the future is means that Luke shouldn't be encouraged to face Vader expecting not to have to fight for his life. It would be utterly irresponsible of both masters to encourage their pupil to win Vader over with "love" if there was any chance of Vader truly being irredeemable. Promoting a false hope in Luke would be dangerous (and unnecessary).
I'm not proposing that Yoda and Obi-Wan were working with any assumption of certainty as to the outcome. Only hope based on strong supposition by way of *some* clairvoyance. As such, they needed to prepare Luke to be on guard and defend himself. Kinda like this: "Let's make sure that Luke goes in with a sword and not an olive branch. If Anakin is still reachable, he'll only be won over by his own existing feelings and Luke won't be able to create those feelings in him. But if he can't be reached, even by love for his son, then we can't let this kid go in with false hope and just become another of Palpatine's dark puppets. If Luke must kill Vader to survive, then that's how it has to be and we're still screwed."
That's the way I rationalize it. Your mileage may vary.