If anything us Nolanites are closer to the Tolkien crowd, that means you josh
The twitards are a phenomenon onto themselves
You have my attention now. How are they closer to Tolkien fans?
If anything us Nolanites are closer to the Tolkien crowd, that means you josh
The twitards are a phenomenon onto themselves
The twitards are a phenomenon onto themselves
For one:
Twitards are basically mostly teenage girls.
Nolanites vary in age and gender, and can actually backup their fandom with substance, thought out arguments and logical debate. While i'm not very familiar with the goings ons in the Tolkien threads/forums/websites, from the few LOTR geeks I know, these trait seems to be similar.
Also while I could care less about others opinions of stuff that I love, Nolanites and Tolkien folk (as far as the LOTR films are concerned) have critically acclaimed films to backup their stance. I don't think any of the Twilight films will make any list of 100 greatest films of all time.
For one:
Twitards are basically mostly teenage girls.
Nolanites vary in age and gender, and can actually backup their fandom with substance, thought out arguments and logical debate. While i'm not very familiar with the goings ons in the Tolkien threads/forums/websites, from the few LOTR geeks I know, these trait seems to be similar.
Also while I could care less about others opinions of stuff that I love, Nolanites and Tolkien folk (as far as the LOTR films are concerned) have critically acclaimed films to backup their stance. I don't think any of the Twilight films will make any list of 100 greatest films of all time.
For one:
Nolancompoops are at heart mostly teenage girls.
I just can't believe K-Stew cheated on R-Patz!
Eh...there are exceptions...but for the most part, anything bad said by TDK Trilogy (That's not in the vain of a stupid nitpick) is usually followed by
"SHUT THE ____ UP YOU STOOPID IDIOT! U SO STUPID! DIE NOW PLEASE. DIE AND STOP BEING STOOPID"
But this was on SHH. So.
Fair enough
....
I'd say the "Nolanites" are far more arrogant and dramatically defensive than LotR fans...
Batman is a comic book character, so Nolan's Batman films are comic book movies. Watchmen, 300, A History of Violence, From Hell and Road to Perdition are other comic book movies. A comic book movie can be long, dark, serious and adult oriented, depending upon the source material. Not all comic material is intended for kids, and therefore not all movies adapted from comic books are going to be appropriate for children. That doesn't mean they aren't comic book adaptations.
thenammagazine said:You're not going to crack the shell of their walled-up mentality on that. They have to segregate Nolan's films to justify them to themselves. It's pretty sad.
tomandshell said:OK, categorize them according to the amount of color and humor and see how they stack up.
I'd consider myself a Nolanite and I think they're comic book movies. I understand what people are getting at in the tone/structure is so different from previous comic book films so these can't be clumped into that category. But films shouldn't be clumped into just one category. They can fit into multiple genres. And Nolan's films do that since we're all having this argument. Kinda like what void mentioned about the buckets above I guess.
I'd say the "Nolanites" are far more arrogant and dramatically defensive than LotR fans...
It's a landmark comic book movie in and of itself. And you're wrong. Not only will it be remembered as the movie that proved Warner Brothers wrong, but it'll also be remembered and revered as the comic book movie Everest. Nobody thought it would work. It did. It's already set the gold standard and WB's running to catch up.
The irony is that most of these trolls were touting TDK as "the best comic book movie EVARRRRRRRRRRR!" when it was released and became the phenom that it was. Now that they find it spanked by Avengers like the redheaded stepchild it is, it's suddenly, "Nolan's movies aren't comic book movies."