Based on past experience in licensing approvals, they don't care that much about accuracy in face sculpts - which is why you will find a lot of stuff, particularly non-hot toys products, that have terrible likeness. What you have to question is why Hot Toys would submit something like that Ant Man smiling sculpt for approval. And keep in mind, the stuff they are submitting for approval is generally better looking than the final product. A somewhat poor sculpt can still look good if painted well, but any issues become more glaring with production paint (especially when you're pushing out so many more products and using more factories).
Yep, exactly what I was saying in an earlier post. It really is baffling.
I remember Jack from the Red Letter Media YT channel discussing his freelance video work once and explaining that certain companies he made videos for would always request changes for no reason other than to feel like they had some input or influence into the final video. So he would often just add extra things to his first cut because he knew they were going to ask for changes no matter what anyway. I could imagine a similar attitude from a company like Disney or the actors themselves, like they want to appear to have some sort of influence or input into the final sculpt even if it ends up worse than the first version that they saw.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk