Hot Toys DX09 - BATMAN - Batman (Michael Keaton) - Specs & Pics

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
You also remember when this came out in 1989 there really was nothing like it. There was really no advanced Computer Animation until Jurassic Park, so everything was built as sets. (which I wish they would do more of these days).

So yah, there a definitely flaws in story and production, but its fantasy. You have to let your imagination open up. Things are not supposed to add up to real life. If a gun shoots down a BatPlane, its because its fantasy and its a movie, and in a lot of ways Burton's Batman is very much like a Cartoon. His influences definitely come from cartoons. And its Batman. He's fiction. Burton went wild on the fantasy world whereas Nolan tries to make it a more realistic world.

Totally different movies. Really dont even like to compare them.


This and also, if you put any film of this genre (the superhero film) through the plausibility ringer they fail in being believable.

- How does Spider-Man have such a great looking, professional suit if he's a poor kid from Queens?

- Why didn't Batman go back up to the Penthouse to get the Joker. Better yet, how is Batman not dead from that fall?

- How does an Iron Man villain not get paralyzed when a car smashes into his legs multiple times?

- Wolverine is Canadian, yet he fights in the Civil War?

- Superman can turn back time by flying the world in the opposite direction?

I could go on and on.
 
Last edited:
This and also, if you put any film of this genre (the superhero film) through the plausibility ringer they fail in being believable.

- How does Spider-Man have such a great looking, professional suit if he's a poor kid from Queens?

- Why didn't Batman go back up to the Penthouse to get the Joker. Better yet, how is Batman not dead from that fall?

- How does an Iron Man villain not get paralyzed when a car smashes into his legs multiple times?

- Wolverine is Canadian, yet he fights in the Civil War?

I could go on and on.

Thanks for ruining all of those other superhero movies for me, JK :lol , also I agree with an earlier post that when I was 10 I could care less about plot holes...this was a comic brought to life. Before this all I can remember was the 70's live action Spiderman, Supes, and Batman on TV. This movie was so different and groundbreaking at the time.
 
One other point I'd like to make is if 89 Bats was very realistic Nolans wouldn't stand out since it would have been done already...with it the way it is both movies feel fresh to me and neither feels recycled.
 
One other point I'd like to make is if 89 Bats was very realistic Nolans wouldn't stand out since it would have been done already...with it the way it is both movies feel fresh to me and neither feels recycled.
That is very true. And I've said it before: burton's Batman was exactly the right batman movie for 1989. And everything that it didn't accomplish is what allowed Nolan to make such a different version in 2005. Two very different takes, both great for different reasons.
 
Film is all about interpretation.

If storytelling issues or plot holes make a film a "dumb summer blockbuster" than almost every superhero film is a dumb summer blockbuster. That includes all 7 Batman films.

No.

No movie is perfect, of course. All movies have plot problems...does that mean we should judge them all the same?

Shaq's STEEL, and Halle Berry's Catwoman, Batman & Robin had plot problems. They are dumb movies (not sure they took in enough to be technically called blockbusters though :lol....)

Hey, X2, Iron Man, Superman '78 also had plot problems! Are they the same level of dumb? There is nuance and different levels of ridiculousness there that we can account for.

All movies have plot holes...not all movies are on the same level of quality.

For all the nitpicking of plot details I can make about Batman '89 (and Batman Returns...yes AND Batman Begins, and The Dark Knight) The main reasons the Burton films don't stand up to the Nolan ones for me are not about the minute nitpicky details. It's not about who had the better special effects, music, costumes, set design or even mood. (For the record, I love the art direction in Burton's Batman) It's about who "gets" the character. Tim Burton was never a fan of Batman comic books, and he didn't even read any of the comics to research the character. Really? And you're the director?

Burton even said that he believes Bruce Wayne putting on the batsuit was a guy "trying to become something he's not." This sentence sums up the main difference between Burton's and Nolan's overall approach to the character, and it's got nothing to do with nitpicking plot details. Nolan show's us that his Bruce Wayne is a vicious fighter even without the batsuit and gadgets to help him. [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1j6q4RrYv8"]Batman prison fight scene - YouTube[/ame]

What does Burton give us of tough Bruce Wayne without his suit and gadgets to help him? "C'mon, let's get nuts!" :lol [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OufCgFZCyU"]Dance With the Devil Scene - Batman Movie (1989) - HD - YouTube[/ame]

I actually agree with your post a couple pages back with photos of Keaton going from funny man in Mr. Mom to an intimidating figure...in the batsuit. It seems to be the point Burton was making as well. Without the batsuit, he's not really much.

That's why I kind of understand those that say we don't need to see any of Batman's training origin to see just how and why he became what he is. That's what exactly Burton was thinking too.

These guys go into way more detail but fair warning, it's a bit of a read (you know, modern audiences and their low attention spans and all :lol) https://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/05/23/batman-1989-review/

All that said, believe it or not, I am grateful for Tim Burton and Michael Keaton's take on Batman. Before them, the live action image of Batman in people's mind was Adam West and exploding sharks. Besides Schumacher lightening (...and then killing) the franchise they started, several good interpretations were at least partly inspired by their take on the mythos. Notably, Batman the Animated Series.

I've got the movie on VHS (from when I was a kid) and on DVD and the special edition booklet Blu-Ray, and I watch it from time to time because its a nostalgia piece from my childhood. Got Keaton Batman and Nicholson Joker on pre-order, and am damn sure getting the Batmobile (even if they botch the paintjob :panic:)
 
I think Burton was giving Keaton a Clark Kent-like scene there, not going to have him run around beating the ____ out of everyone in the room but, rather taking care of the situation without revealing that other darker violent side of Bruce Wayne, though having him act aggressive rather to put a end to the whole thing in which Bruce clearly had prepared himself for.


That Nolan Bruce Wayne in jail beating up all those Asian dudes was such a blurr, i remember really disliking Batman Begins when it came out, it grew on me a year later or so. With 89 Batman, because i was 9yrs old and this was the first live action blockbuster Batman movie,it was a much more amazing experience and great memories, hell even the ToyBiz and Dark Knight Collection toys kick the ____ out of the Begins garbage toys kids got today, i still enjoy the Burton films and Begins..TDK collects dust.
 
Last edited:
I think Burton was giving Keaton a Clark Kent-like scene there, not going to have him run around beating the ____ out of everyone in the room but, rather taking care of the situation without revealing that other darker violent side of Bruce Wayne, though having him act aggressive rather to put a end to the whole thing in which Bruce clearly had prepared himself for.

Forgive me because now I'm going to have to nitpick this scene. :lol
Because he doesn't really "take care of the situation" there, he's just lucky it worked out. Yes, putting the metal tray under his shirt shows his resourcefulness in protecting himself (he made a pretty good guess that Joker would shoot him). But I don't understand how getting shot helps the truly vulnerable person in the room--Vicky. Whether or not he gets killed is moot, because he just lays there (and then slips out when no one is looking)...but how does any of this protect Vicky from being killed or kidnapped? She's just lucky that the Joker just wasn't in the mood to harm her at that moment.
 
Tim Burton was never a fan of Batman comic books, and he didn't even read any of the comics to research the character. Really? And you're the director?

And yet, he did?

I think the Killing Joke and Dark Knight Returns were cited books that he read.

Who cares if he wasn't a fan? He still must have loved what he was doing, or else he wouldn't have done it, nor would he have made "another one". You think everyone that's part of these films enjoys the source, i.e. comics? They have a job to do and a story to tell.

Burton even said that he believes Bruce Wayne putting on the batsuit was a guy "trying to become something he's not."

No he said he put on the suit for effect, which is what Batman does. Without the suit, you're getting stabbed by hookers or jumping from rooftops in a ski mask. With the Batman persona your enemy is afraid of you.

That's exactly what that means. In Begins and Mask of the Phantasm Bruce Wayne realizes that he can't fight crime until the criminal element fear him.

The suit, the image, it's what it's all about.


I actually agree with your post a couple pages back with photos of Keaton going from funny man in Mr. Mom to an intimidating figure...in the batsuit. It seems to be the point Burton was making as well. Without the batsuit, he's not really much.


I also posted pics of him without the batsuit.
 
We could all go back and forth on this, but at the end of the day apparently all of us involved in this conversation like 89 Bats and BB and TDK, so to me its a win win for all of us.

Now this is the first HT figure that I ordered 2 Bats and 2 Jokers...that's how much I dig these guys.
 
We could all go back and forth on this, but at the end of the day apparently all of us involved in this conversation like 89 Bats and BB and TDK, so to me its a win win for all of us.

Emphasis on apparently.
 
Guys I have a feeling this guy wont be a leaker, I mean HT saw how disappointed and angry fans got with the DX02, and I mean neither the OC Bats or the TDK Bats have leaked yet, so thats a good sign right?
 
The more I think of it the more I wouldn't mind spending 20$ more on batman if they included something reminiscent of the batcave to display him on kind of like what they did with JS and the rudder.

Thats why I mentioned it would be cool to get a cardboard backdrop depicting the batcave computer set-up...to display Batman with...It's not really a display stand, but I'd pay extra for that...

Matt
 
And yet, he did?

I think the Killing Joke and Dark Knight Returns were cited books that he read.

Who cares if he wasn't a fan? He still must have loved what he was doing, or else he wouldn't have done it, nor would he have made "another one". You think everyone that's part of these films enjoys the source, i.e. comics? They have a job to do and a story to tell.
Of course not everyone who makes a comic movie loves the source. Those that do respect it have a better chance of making a good adaptation though, do you disagree? Burton's own words on the source material:
"My impulse was, I said to myself, "____ this bull____!" This is comic-book material. I thought, you know, who really cares? But it was a mistake. It went too far." - Tim Burton
https://www.timburtoncollective.com/articles/misc5.html

He didn't love it, and he didn't want to do "another one" (Burton isn't interested in sequels) but he did it because he was interested in the new characters of Catwoman, Penguin, and...Max Shreck. Also as you note, it is a "job to do" to some people, so I'm sure WB throwing buckets of money at him helped too ;)


No he said he put on the suit for effect, which is what Batman does. Without the suit, you're getting stabbed by hookers or jumping from rooftops in a ski mask. With the Batman persona your enemy is afraid of you.

That's exactly what that means. In Begins and Mask of the Phantasm Bruce Wayne realizes that he can't fight crime until the criminal element fear him.

The suit, the image, it's what it's all about.

I disagree. First, this is what he said (from which I pulled that quote):
Bob’s design was less an outfit, more a complete body suit. It isn’t tights and underwear worn on the outside, but a complete operatic costume to overstate the image ‘Batman’ has of himself. We just took off from the psychology of saying, ‘Here’s a guy who doesn’t look like Arnold Schwarzenegger, so why is he doing this?’ He’s trying to create an image for himself – he’s trying to become something he’s not. - Tim Burton
https://blogs.amctv.com/movie-blog/2007/06/reinventing-the.php

I see what you are saying. Yes the batsuit is supposed to be scary and intimidating to criminals that run into Batman. Of course, I am not disputing that. What I am saying is that that is not all Batman is about--the "image" of fear. Once again, Nolan (and Batman TAS + Mask of The Phantasm, now that you mentioned it) showed us the damage Wayne could do to his enemies even without it, Burton didn't. Of course having it on and having your enemies scared _____less helps, no dispute there.

I also posted pics of him without the batsuit.

That you did. But all he is doing in those shots is brooding. Any actor worth his salt would be able to keep a serious face. There is more to "being" Batman than walking around with a stern facial expression on all the time. This is not a dig at Keaton, because the shooting script really didn't call for him to do much as Bruce Wayne to show how capable he was.

We could all go back and forth on this, but at the end of the day apparently all of us involved in this conversation like 89 Bats and BB and TDK, so to me its a win win for all of us.

Emphasis on apparently.

Lol I would hope so especially with over 500$ on PO!
:exactly: If you guys mean me, then yes, I do appreciate Burton's Batman, and yes, I am dropping massive cheese for these pre-orders. :wave
 
Thats why I mentioned it would be cool to get a cardboard backdrop depicting the batcave computer set-up...to display Batman with...It's not really a display stand, but I'd pay extra for that...

Matt

Yeah I would love a backdrop as well...the Godfather came with one and a chair and was probably half the price it you got it at retail, which I didn't, and it was still cheaper than many DX's. It's also great looking when taking pics. So I hope that Bats and Joker come with one.
 
He didn't love it, and he didn't want to do "another one" (Burton isn't interested in sequels) but he did it because he was interested in the new characters of Catwoman, Penguin

Why would he want to do those? He's not a fan of the comics or characters? Wait, isn't that a contradiction?

Must have been the money.


I disagree.

You disagree about WHAT? That the point of Batman isn't about the imagery, isn't about striking fear into criminals, or appearing to be inhuman or supernatural?

That IS what it's all about.

The cowl, the cape, the image. Without it, Batman isn't Batman.

- You bring up one scene where Bruce Wayne beats up a bunch of asians at a prison but I seem to recall him getting carried away to solitary confinement, defeated.

- In Mask of the Phantasm, the group of criminals think he's a joke. They get a few punches in and almost get away and Bruce gets injured because they didn't fear him.

- In the comics he goes out to a sleazy part of town, tries to stop a pimp and a prostitute gets knife happy, he gets beat down, and cops shoot him. He flees and gets inspiration while he's close to bleeding to death.

- Like wise, in Batman '89 Bruce stands up to the Joker (who is surrounded by muscle with weapons by the way) and gets shot.

Yeah, Bruce Wayne is a tough guy, that's because he is Batman. BUT the suit, the costume, whatever completes the persona. I thought this was common knowledge?

You're making Bruce Wayne seem like he doesn't need the suit, when in fact, he does. It's stupid. That's literally half of what Batman is about, like it or not. Yeah, Wayne has the abilities without the suit and the suit is only one aspect that defines Batman but that image is the most important aspect. So what's your end game? That because we don't see the Keaton Bruce Wayne fight in hand to hand combat that he can't do it? Whaaaaaaat? He can fight as Batman, he can threaten the Joker as Bruce Wayne but he can't fight, as Bruce Wayne? Yet he tries?


‘Here’s a guy who doesn’t look like Arnold Schwarzenegger, so why is he doing this?’ He’s trying to create an image for himself – he’s trying to become something he’s not. - Tim Burton.

https://blogs.amctv.com/movie-blog/20...enting-the.php

I think you're taking that waaaaay out of context. Look at what he said right there. "He doesn't look like Arnold Schwarzenegger" (does Kilmer, Clooney or Bale?) and "He's trying to create an image for imself, he's trying to become something he's not."

What is he trying to become Dark Magic? Certainly not Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Could it be a,

Bat%20Sketch.jpg



I don't think Bruce Wayne is a bat, is he? Sure you could say that could be reaching, but then again I could say the same of you.

I see what you are saying. Yes the batsuit is supposed to be scary and intimidating to criminals that run into Batman. Of course, I am not disputing that. What I am saying is that that is not all Batman is about--the "image" of fear.

If you're implying that it's also about being a "symbol of hope" and an image about getting good people to rally together to do the right thing, you're wrong. Don't even give the Nolan films as an example, because Batman fails miserably in that department, and even acknowledges that. Not only does his image inspire madness he fully admits that he isn't a symbol of hope. He disregards it completely. Bruce Wayne and Gotham's "light" and "symbol" is a guy that attempted to kill an innocent kid, what's that say?

Bruce Wayne can't do the things Batman can. That's the point. That's why there is the philanthropic side of Bruce Wayne, that's something Batman can't do.


Once again, Nolan (and Batman TAS + Mask of The Phantasm, now that you mentioned it) showed us the damage Wayne could do to his enemies even without it, Burton didn't.

Batman Forever showed us Kilmer Bruce Wayne (not Batman) beating the crap out of 20 thugs and winning. It takes a SHOT to the FACE to stop him. Not Asian soldiers, not a pimp, not a prostitute with a knife. A bullet to the face.

Again, what's your point?

Bale Batman is the toughest of em all? They're ALL the same character. If the script called for Keaton Bruce to fight a million extraterrestrial aliens, then the film would depict just that, Bruce Wayne fighting a million extraterrestrial aliens.


That you did. But all he is doing in those shots is brooding. Any actor worth his salt would be able to keep a serious face. There is more to "being" Batman than walking around with a stern facial expression on all the time. This is not a dig at Keaton, because the shooting script really didn't call for him to do much as Bruce Wayne to show how capable he was.

I guess he doesn't have a personality at the Wayne Manor event when he's making digs at Alexander Knox and being a sarcastic, son of a _____. I guess we never see him upset over the fact that his parents were taken from him in is youth. I guess we never see any other side of his character like when he's investigating looking through files and talking with Alfred.

There's just Bat-Mike and Brooding Mike, my mistake.







And yes, you could fool me that you actually have any interest in this figure at all.

I could say I appreciate Killer Klowns from Outer space for what it is but would that mean I actually care that much about it and want to own figures of it. NO.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top