Re: HOT TOYS : MMS DX 12 - The Dark Knight Rises - BATMAN / BRUCE WAYNE Full Specs &
Then you should watch interviews with Tim Burton and the other people responsible for the movies to set you straight. It's difficult to comprehend that anyone could say that the original movies, including sets and costumes weren't silly, whimsical, comical and devoid of any semblance of realism (in other words, surreal) - that was the whole point behind the creative decisions they made at the time. This flows through every part of the movie, including dialog and plot.
What interviews are you watching?
The filmmakers, cast and crew of Batman all set out to make a darker, more serious version of the character that was far removed from the Adam West show (not that there was anything wrong with that take, or that there's anything wrong with camp).
What aspects of Batman, the character, are campy, silly or comical in Batman 1989? I really want to know. Is it the black body armor as opposed to the light grays and blues? The fact that instead of quipping and making puns or tongue and cheek jokes, this character barely even jokes or says a word? Maybe it's that no-nonsense, grim expression that he has on his face? Does that make him silly that he takes everything serious or when he's offended when someone claims that he may be psychotic? How about publicity? The 60s show Batman, Schumacher Batman and Nolan Batman all go out in public and are practically known when they're seen in day light and in person. The 1989 Batman? He hides in the shadows. He doesn't let Vicki Vale get a look at him.
Realism? Huh?
The first Batman film started the trend of black body armor. The first Batman film invented/introduced the idea of the grapple gun. Batman stores his suit in an armory vault instead of sliding down a pole and magically getting his suit. All of his toys were grounded in reality just like the Nolan films. The difference? The first film didn't explain them. It didn't have a check list of mentioning how everything functioned and worked practically, it just went with the audience. The Bale Batman borrows all of that. The rubber suit, the gear, the armory vault, etc. etc. Instead, it's more factitious with it the explanations. "Oh, yeah, Batman's suit was a military Nomex survival suit", "Batman's Batmobile? Military base jumping vehicle", "The cape? Memory fabric". "Grapple gun? Uhhh, gas powered".
That's the only difference. In Batman 1989, they're more subtle with it. "Some kind of body armor" for the armor. "How much do you weigh" and gas spewing out of the hook for the grapple gun (which of course jams the reel winch mechanism since the weight exceeds the limit).
It didn't bog you down with how the world worked and functioned, it just was. How can anyone fault it for that? I like the explanations in the Nolan movies as much as the next guy, but there's nothing wrong with how Batman functioned in the Burton films. In fact, as far as suits and weaponry goes, that Batman had the most practical weapons FIRST. His Batarang and Grapple gun weren't these flashy, gaudy weapons that Schumacher used. The first grapple gun in 1989? It's the iphone 4 whereas the huge, Begins grapple is like some big, clunky 80s cellular device that might as well be a hand canon.