The HT sculpt REALLY looks off doesnt it??
The HT sculpt REALLY looks off doesnt it??
I don't think it's a good likeness at all, but forgetting that issue, as just a generic person it looks very weird. It looks sort of like a young actor with poor "old people" make-up applied (of the Winona Ryder in 'Edward Scissorhands' variety), with the strange overabundance of wrinkles under the eyes and the deep-cut creases on the forehead. Something just seems real "off" about it for me. Maybe also the eyes are a little tiny.
I find it really a strange sculpt. The face has the angular/skeletal quality of Viggo Mortensen, and the eyes, the weirdest part, are almost indescribable in their peculiarity - there's something about the eyes that I can't quite put my finger on... They look less like a human's and more like a dog's, or maybe a shark, but not an angry shark but rather a lonely shark that wants desperately to be your friend...
don't worry about the blame of others,we have this in our hands and with own eyes we can say it is outstanding...Its a cool sculpt, but like others have said, it doesnt capture the character....
Its a cool sculpt, but it doesnt capture the character....
yes.. is just a point of view..I will continue too see a more lifelike landa in did's sculpts than Ht lol.And character isn't a static stalagmite. Everyone has their own opinion on how they wants to see a character on their shelf. No one sayin that DID's version is bad, uninteresting or else and those who seein this character only with his awesome smirk surely will buy it! However there's an objective view - both heads aren't perfect and have a different expression but HT's one looks more natural sculpt and paint wise.
There's some logic, don't you think?
My opinion, if I want a 1/6th Christoph Waltz figure, I'll go with Hot Toys. If I want Col. Hans Landa, I'll go with DID.
Enter your email address to join: