- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 291
Sounds like a ****ing crazy movie.
Lots of great stuff popping up. The final film was pretty faithful to the original concept.
https://youtu.be/GiZRuOxiCGw
I'm a big fan of musical scores, was pretty disappointed that neither of these songs from the trailer were on the soundtrack. So I just bought them both and added them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXqMrftUXs0
https://extnctofficial.bandcamp.com/track/iron-man-3-trailer-music-extncts-full-version
Did you see my live action Invader Zim trailer?
Why would they be in the movie? It's the trailer music. Unless they used the score for the trailer, it would never be in the film.
It's a separate thing all together. Most trailer music isn't made for the film.
I watched "The Avengers" again last night. In that, Stark's introduction sequence (from underwater to the scene in Stark Tower) is better than the entirety of "Iron Man 3". Absolutely. And not just because Silvestri's score owns there especially ("Stark Goes Green").
I still think it's okay, but I contend IM3 will go down as the TDKR of Marvel movies. And not in the good way.
I watched "The Avengers" again last night. In that, Stark's introduction sequence (from underwater to the scene in Stark Tower) is better than the entirety of "Iron Man 3". Absolutely. And not just because Silvestri's score owns there especially ("Stark Goes Green").
I still think it's okay, but I contend IM3 will go down as the TDKR of Marvel movies. And not in the good way.
So Iron Man's first appearance underwater, then flying up talking about clean energy, then Stark making out with Potts and talking to Coulson is better than everything in Iron Man 3?
So Iron Man's first appearance underwater, then flying up talking about clean energy, then Stark making out with Potts and talking to Coulson is better than everything in Iron Man 3?
What's so compelling there? The clean energy? BSing to Coulson and Potts? Looking at a computer?