A John Wick spinoff still seems like a silly idea to me, but the trailer does look pretty promising. And any excuse to watch Ana De Armas kicking ass for two hours is a good one.
Well this isn't the first one .A John Wick spinoff still seems like a silly idea to me
It really annoyed me that she played such a great character in the last of Daniel Craig's Bond movies. Before I saw the ending - I thought to myself, "I can't wait to see her again in a sequel".
A John Wick spinoff still seems like a silly idea to me
Yup I've really tired of the "serious and gritty" Bond movies. It was cool the first few times, but now I just want to get back to Bond being fun and sexy again.Yeah... I feel like Barbara B. could take some lessons from that Ana sequence in NTTD -- that's how an entire Bond movie should feel: fast, fun, sophisticated, sexy and exhilarating. Something the Craig Bond's have struggled to be with their deadly slow plots.
Bond being fun and sexy again.
Been waiting for Ana to do an action movie since her stint in No Time To Die... a lackluster Bond where she was the BEST part by far.
I look forward to this.
You obviously havenāt seen The Grey Man or Ghosted, other action movies that are lackluster except for her.Been waiting for Ana to do an action movie since her stint in No Time To Die... a lackluster Bond where she was the BEST part by far.
I look forward to this.
When will Hollywood get the memo that these days an overabundance of tattoos is the domain of mom and dad or a SDCC dude giving the booth tour on YT, not the righteous-irony artiste assassin/vigilante set.
So HT made Wick, who will be up for adding a Ballerina figure to their manly doll collection?
As far as I can tell her tat "Lux in Tenebris" = Light in Darkness.
What the hell are you talking aboutWhen will Hollywood get the memo that these days an overabundance of tattoos is the domain of mom and dad or a SDCC dude giving the booth tour on YT, not the righteous-irony artiste assassin/vigilante set.
It's becoming about as dumb as gun-control activist Hollywood producing yet another five dozen movies/series that make 100% clear using a gun is the (only) way of moral clarity for pretty much any problem.
When will Hollywood get the memo that these days an overabundance of tattoos is the domain of mom and dad or a SDCC dude giving the booth tour on YT, not the righteous-irony artiste assassin/vigilante set.
It's becoming about as dumb as gun-control activist Hollywood producing yet another five dozen movies/series that make 100% clear using a gun is the (only) way of moral clarity for pretty much any problem.
The tattoos are just a part of the Ruska Romaās culture and identity.I mean they are not wrong, tats are not outsider, edgy, or the visual cue of some extreme life, they are about as common, safe and trendy as can be. Do they "realistically" serve as a short hand to rep Russian organized crime? Does it mater, it's Hollywood fantasy!
And yes Hollywood folk do tend to spew left anti-gun anxiety and rhetoric, yet then glamorize and fetishize it in their films. Is that a problem for the champaign left po$ture? Or really a debate meritable of this particular film and thread, over any other film glut of the same? Not really.
Fan made, yet I do like this poster as somewhat nod to previous:
Enter your email address to join: