bangkok_wolf
Super Freak
No argument is being made as I didn't make any point contradicting you I'm just solely point out a sentence that possibly represent you and the way you judge and/or rate a game and we are speaking of a heavily story drive game like mgs. From what we have seen, the graphic looks great (perfect? May be in PC. We'll see) and gameplay seems amazing no doubt (perfect? No first hand experience so who knows), so I find it irrational to say something is (or will be, in this case) great just from presumption especially when the game doesn't have a release date. I'm happy for you seeing how much value and support you have for it, I just hope the game will live up to your expectation when you have actually played itWhich is?
All the info just posted, and the only thing you decide to respond to is a sentence from my post that you don’t agree with, whats the point of your brilliant observation, to start an argument?
Hey now that's just a bit low. There's nothing wrong about a GAMER praising a game for its GAMEPLAY elements. you know? Especially for something like MGS which isn't always just about the story but also how fun and immersive the gameplay can be (hence why Snake Eater is still my top favorite since I thought it had the best balance between story and gameplay).
Absolutely, that's why people are still going for MP on PW and enjoying it for what it is but to saying a game is "great" basing solely on a shown gameplay is .... something. I'm not calling out names or anything, no?