RATE or REVIEW The Last Movie You Watched.

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Black Mass 6/10. Got to see Black Mass for free the other day. Story was really good and is what saved the movie from being a disaster, but Depp was too much like a caricature. I really tried to get into it but couldn't get past the makeup and those damn weird eyes. There wasn't a single moment in the film when he was on screen that I forgot it was Depp in makeup. I kept thinking that if Jack Nicholson would have reprised the role from The Departed it would have been much better. Also, Cumberbatch's Boston accent was horrible, which is too bad because I really like him normally but every time he was on screen I kept asking "Why did they get him for this film?"
 
Portlandia (seasons 1-4) - 10/10

After the disappointing season 5, I have revisited (most of) the first four seasons. I laughed just as hard at the stuff I found hilarious the first time around. There were even a few sketches I remember falling flat that I found myself laughing at.
 
The Martian. Nice visuals. That's about all I can say about it that's good. Ridley Scotts casting choices lately have been appalling. Kirsten Wigg. Ugh. No sense of Peril, too much of a jokey tone and not enough drama. 6/10 and that's being generous.
 
I still enjoy Ghostbusters after seeing it a million times. It's one of those movies I throw in every now and then to have playing as background noise, but I end up watching it every time.
 
The Martian. Nice visuals. That's about all I can say about it that's good. Ridley Scotts casting choices lately have been appalling. Kirsten Wigg. Ugh. No sense of Peril, too much of a jokey tone and not enough drama. 6/10 and that's being generous.

Watney was a wise cracking smart ass in the book so I would expect that in the movie as well. Hope to see it this weekend.
 
I see a pattern here...

:lol



Dr. No - 93/100

Time to start my annual run of James Bond films during the month of October, also kind of nice considering it will line up nicely with SPECTRE to release next month.

So the film, I think what gets me the most in this film, is the scenery. I absolutely love the look of Crab Key. It just has so much vibrant scenes, like the intro of Honey or when they are running near the land mines with Quarrel and Honey. Also, Honey; I absolutely love her. She's probably my favorite Bond girl. To be fair Carrie Fisher, Ursula Andress, and Ann Margret were all childhood crushes I had. But even so, I am in love with her character as well, the story when she told about killing her attacker with a female black widow. The way she kind of asks if she did okay by that; while many view it ditzy, I think if a woman with some sort of innocence of the world. Something we hardly get in films, or we do get them but always made to be like a damsel or so. In the scene when she is holding Bond's hand and going to see Dr. No and she says, "It's nice to know your hands are sweating", with Bond replying, "I'm scared too". It's a moment where both are strong as characters, braving over their fears of what's to possibly come. I could keep going on and on, her love for her father, her business with the shells, her stance on why Bond had to kill the lone wandering guard. She wasn't really made as a nuisance to Bond's survival or just overall annoying.

What I had to deduct was kind of the slacking of character build up or just the loss of character. For example I find it kind of poor how Bond and Quarrel are fighting and Leiter comes in saying, oh ****; we're all a team here. Then Bond and Quarrel are all like, "Ah ****, my bad brother. We cool". I think it could have been a bit more smoother. Then you have Quarrel's downfall. I found it very short and just like a cop out. Then you have Bond and Ryder on the boat at the end taking in their attraction and no sort of grief for Quarrel. I get the point of being a 00 slightly requires a control of emotions, but the writing could have made some sort of notion or something.

Music was okay. Nothing extraordinary, but I guess it follows the tone of the setting. What it doesn't really fit is in the story; and I don't know how many I could really take listening to 4 different covers of "Underneath the Mango Tree". But sound effects weren't bad especially for a 53 year old film. Opening credits also weren't too shabby, didn't really follow a method, but just a mood conveyed of ecstasy.


Dr. No as a character was okay, not a fan of how they made him seem like this all calculating bastard. It's little stupid phrases like when Bond and Ryder are checking the aquarium and he makes a note of how much it cost, and that was what Bond was thinking. Maybe it's just me, I normally think how long something took to make, and much later the cost of it; but that's just me. Another thing that bothered me is why he had an assumption Bond would join SPECTRE. I mean it just seems lazy, then you have the brawl between the two. Dear God, how is a guy with literally iron fists incapable of taking down Bond. His downfall was just too quick, but makes sense as you can't really expect Bond to last long in a battle after being beaten and flushed down a radiation pipe cooler. Lastly, his vengeance seems like something of a little *****. Who cares if neither Eastern or Western powers want your work, I can understand getting shot down as insulting, but to lead to massive slaughter seems a bit extreme. But can't have villains be rational now in days, I suppose.


Connery is just a great Bond, always get a kick from him. Very suave, even still now when you could compare him to the other Bonds. Not going to go into too much detail, but overall still a good film. I love starting off this marathon especially with such a kickass first film.
 
Back
Top