GasparZizou
Super Freak
It just keeps happening
Never saw it. But anyone who wants the theater experience... is getting three more chances with the sequels...
It's a total rip off, even the design of the cat people was a ripoff of a Marvel comic.
He basically took a bunch of stuff and put it all in one film, which is exactly what Lucas did with Indy and Star Wars, yet some people use that against Cameron because the film was so successful, but they ignore how he did the same with The Terminator...even the name was stolen from DC comics (the other company this time), but most people give it a pass because they were kids when they saw SW and Terminator. Personally, I don't care as long as the film is entertaining and offers something new, which they all do, some better than others.
That rating system is okay if you judge a film only by it's rewatch factor. But by that system I'd have to give Schindler's List a 2/5 when in reality I consider it a masterpiece. In no way does that mean that you can't use your own methods but it isn't something I would ever adopt.
It is interesting to think about how people judge movies. That is why I don't put a lot into others scores. Just the general "well a 9/10 must mean they really liked it" for what ever reason. Maybe I am over thinking it but, I believe this is how I will gage my reviews from now on.
Casting 0.0 - 2.0
Story 0.0-2.0
Score 0.0 - 2.0
Cinematography 0.0 - 2.0
Re-watch value 0.0 - 2.0
I hope this will give me the ability to separate movies more.
What?but they ignore how he did the same with The Terminator...even the name was stolen from DC comics (the other company this time)
I didn't say my system was perfect! Lol.
And WWE, just stop. Really. Stop. You can't see you"re setting yourself up for **** with posts like? This is me not hating on you or your opinion. This is me giving you the same advice others have tried giving countless times.
What?
It's true.
He just goes by Deathstroke now...but he was originally introduced as "The Terminator"...in 1980. But that's ancient history, and now when people hear The Terminator name, they think of Arnold, not the original Terminator.
I hated it the first time I saw it. I kept checking my watch and wondering when that **** would end. I could not believe the box office numbers. I could not believe the hype. I'm so happy many went back on their initial feelings for it and hate it with me. I guess the effects were great but I hated the designs of most of the stuff so the point I'd award it for technical achievement is taken away for looking stupid. AotC has some good parts to it. Not many, but I did sit through the movie a half dozen or so times before realizing it was as bad as it was.
Thanks for sharing that photo! I'd heard of that deleted scene but have never seen it before. Neat. Submarines don't submerge unless they're hiding from other ships in wartime. WWII hadn't started yet. Was Germany breaking any national treaties or laws having a submarine in the Mediterranean near Egypt? I never really thought about that either myself.
**** Cameron.It's true.
**** Cameron.
I don't see why you think he ripped off Deathstroke though. They both have the name "Terminator" but that could merely be coincidence.
Meh, I don't see it. Guns aren't very specific and all superheroes/villains are buff.
I can't imagine Cameron would have even known about this comic or character, but who knows, maybe he did.
Enter your email address to join: