I voted resin.
From what I've seen on the forums, cloth 'issues' seem to be one of the main concerns brought up as a reason not to like a piece.
People have complained about:
Spidey PF - seams, blue fabric and red resin, etc
Cap PF - camel toe, cloth not being dark enough, spots on fabric.
Green Goblin - mismatched fabric colors
Wolverine - seams and piping
etc...
I don't think Marvel pieces are well suited to fabric.
When Sideshow does movie (LotR, Star Wars, etc) characters, they can actually see what the end result should look like since there were actually REAL costumes created for the characters. Also, fabric works perfectly for movie characters because the costumes are more complex, multi-layered, multi-fabric arrangements, when compared to Marvel's supposedly skin tight suits.
It's the attempt to make a 'skin tight' outfit that kind of ruins the Marvel PF for me. Each time they attempt it, it ends up looking like stretched t-shirt material.
For anyone who purchased the Venom comiquette, could you imagine them reaching that level of incredible detail while trying to cover it in cloth? He would look like "The Gimp" from Pulp Fiction IMO.
I think the pieces are turning out 'lesser' than they could be. Sure, I'm as happy as the next guy to be getting 1/4 scale Marvel pieces. But after seeing some of the amazing sculpting work done by the Gore Group, I feel strongly that the cloth is limiting the sculptors and their ability to make the pieces we are paying top dollar for, their absolute best.
Let me give you an example. I'm not sure how many saw the Spidey Comiquette before the cloth was applied,
but I'm betting if this piece would have been fully sculpted, it would have been MUCH more widely accepted. The cloth covers up all of the great sculpted detail. In fact, I think it would have been a very difficult statue to top, as far as Spidey's go.
Same with Andy B's Hulk:
It's the same with Cap, Wolvie and Sabretooth. Those guys should be 'ripped', but the fabric covers it all up. Some might say "But Fly, the cloth is more realistic." That argument might work for movie fans, but it doesn't work for comic book fans. We don't want reality, we want the uber-detailed stuff we see in the books. Hot comic book artist aren't hot because they draw 'reality'. It's that over the top, insane detailing that draws comic fans by the droves.
Another problem with fabric is the color. When a factory is painting a statue, they can create whatever colors they like, and achieve the perfect shade for the character. With fabric, they are basically buying the closest match they can find. And, as mentioned in the Sabretooth thread, when a single piece of fabric has to 'change colors' (Cap's midsection, Sabre's leggings) the color is 'light' because the fabric is being stretched and the color is being separated, which in turn makes it look washed out.
Another might say "Fly, Sideshow makes both, why worry?" Well, they may or may not make a 1/4 scale comiquette version of each character they make in PF form. Another point is that I've noticed that sculptors, in general, try not to duplicate their work, or any other sculptors' work, in any form or fashion. I think it is basically a 'that's been done, I need to be original' type of thought process. I understand that. So, let's say you absolutely love the Cap PF. You think that the pose on that piece is the end all, be all of 'perfect' Cap, but you
reeaaaaly dislike the cloth. Guess what, you're probably not going to see that same pose in the future comiquette.
I guess the point behind this rant is, I think Sideshow is leaving something on the table everytime they apply cloth to a Marvel piece. A) We don't get the full dynamics of what the piece could have been, and B) The pose they used is 'spent' meaning we possibly will have to settle for a lesser comiquette.
Again, my thoughts only apply to MARVEL pieces. I wouldn't trade some of my other PFs for anything sculpted. I do love fabric, but I feel it doesn't belong on Marvel statues.