BurningRage
Super Freak
Re: Official Sideshow Batman PF
This is rad:
Thats ****en rad.
This is rad:
Thats ****en rad.
Well there are beliefs then there are facts.
Spidey, you are 100% correct. The eyes were the dealbreaker for me on this piece, and I cancelled. As someone who teaches anatomy for illustration students at the university level, those basic proportions are learned at the beginning level. I can't understand how talented sculptors and seasoned art directors could miss something so rudimentary.
The untrained eye may not see this, but it sticks out like a sore thumb for me. Luckily, both PF heads are better proportionately.
Well there are beliefs then there are facts.
Spidey, that was a quick sketch, not critically accurate by any means. But using the calipers it is proportioned correctly, one eye apart. The problem I think you are having is by applying 3 dimensional proportions to a 2 dimensional image.
The eyes do continue a little further towards the center (nose) that you really cant see in the picture due to lighting/shadow/contours etc. I know it's a silly argument but I just wanted to post a counterpoint when you state as fact that the eyes are out of whack, 'cause they aint
Ok now let's get back to complaining about the PFs fat legs!
Tamato ... I am not trying to be rude here ... I am not.. but that measurement... with eyes being one eye width apart .... IS a two dimensional measurement, and it is the one used by all of the greats. NO matter how well lit a photo is... when I apply the measurement it is off.
Here is another example
The eye width measurement is suppose to be done in 2D Tam. I have seen this bad boy in person and it looked off when I saw it then. Three different examples all show the same thing Dude... pretty close to a fact m8.
Now let me be clear. That is all nitpick... I think the bust looks amazing, but it stood out for me right away everytime I have seen it. I am not putting the statue down, but like you I have studied art, and this is off when put against the "classic" proportions and that is WHY I prefer the PF sculpt to the bust. It is simply a preference thing.
As for the short fat legs... we will have to see.
lol dont steal my pics bro!
lol dont steal my pics bro!
Free For All!
Fact: I own the bust and its amazing in person.
Fact: Photo's of the bust for whatever reason make the eyes seem way more off they they are in person.
This exactly
hmm, where did you steal that picture from? Oh yeah, its one of mine. Many might find it rude to steal other's pics without asking, especially to trash one of their favorite collection pieces
The eye width measurement is suppose to be done in 2D Tam. I have seen this bad boy in person and it looked off when I saw it then. Three different examples all show the same thing Dude... pretty close to a fact m8.
Guess you missed the part where I said
"Now let me be clear. That is all nitpick... I think the bust looks amazing, but it stood out for me right away everytime I have seen it. I am not putting the statue down, but like you I have studied art, and this is off when put against the "classic" proportions and that is WHY I prefer the PF sculpt to the bust. It is simply a preference thing."
As for using your pic I wasn't trashing your prized piece or at least I wasn't trying to. I was making a simple observation that is evident in the pictures and in person. It should diminish your enjoyment of the piece. Especially if you can't see it. As for using your pic without asking I do apologize, but it had the best lighting around the eyes
Hey bit of an argument. You don't actually get that much arguing now. I remember when I 1st joined Freaks some used to go on for pages. I miss them days
Hey, WHY DON'T YOU GO **** YOURSELF RAGING BULL!
Proceed
Enter your email address to join: