No its based on no sith having kids, in fact anakin was the first jedi to have kids "the forbiden Love". Palpatine didnt love anyone but himself the whole idea of that disfigured dude banging a chick is just ****ing insanity. Not to mention, if anything he was never shown to be attracted to women, which is why he never had a female apprentice. That has to mean something If were just going to base things on what we see in the movies, palps didnt even like women he liked boys and men which is why he gave anikan all those creepy pedophile looks
Found again on the internet.. It must be true
This was just some SW EU geeks opinion.
The Sith code puts passion as the start of their power, so as you can imagine, a lot of Sith philosophy deals with acting on your desires, and sexual desires are no different. However, due to the nature of being a Sith, there was no need for love, more specifically attachment. The Sith did not like attachment, but not in the same way that the Jedi did, the Jedi feared attachment because losing what you were atached to would bring you to the dark side, the Sith did not like attachment since it could be used against you and could be considered a weakness in a society that encourages strength. As such, most Sith relationships focused on the fiery passion of the moment, and still had an air of distrust since either one would kill the other for more power should the opportunity arrive.