Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019
Star Wars will survive. Kennedy won't.
Star Wars will survive. Kennedy won't.
Can I direct a Stah Wahs movie too?
We all know Johnson and Disney has been doing extensive damage control for the TLJ, and pathetically at that, since shortly after its release and all the backlash started. But has Kennedy herself even made a peep?? She did maybe, what 1 or 2 interview panels with other people, but has she come out on her own and made any official statements??
I think Disney has quietly chained her in a dungeon somewhere. Bob Iger is making her pay for her war crimes against the fans and Disney's bottom line.
Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner making excuses for TLJ merchandise’ low sales:
As if they haven’t been doing this every single year and don’t know how it works by now. As if ‘other toys hitting around the same time’ ever stopped something that people really wanted. I’m sure they must have sold more before people saw the movie and didn’t want the toys anymore in fact.
They’re in full damage control mode on every aspect of this, from the film itself to the toys.
So they appear to be going with the official line that there is no problem (Kennedy is not making any potentially polarising statements and LFL/Disney are having articles published to cast dispersions on the 'haters' and create excuses unrelated to their poor story telling to explain ticket revenue and toy sales) and more subtlety they are course correcting by hiring JJ to finish off the trilogy.
That's my take on it
Johnson: "Empire" would have gotten roasted. If you look at the criticism of "Last Jedi," can you imagine what they would have said about Luke just getting his ass handed to him by Vader? Oh my God.
Nice chatting with you again bud. I like it when PT boys like you and Prime Clone chime in.
Whether it worked or not, I do applaud LFL/Johnson for taking a risk with TLJ. Last thing I expected, especially after TFA and RO.
My theory is that Johnson's concept offered them a way forward (Canto Bight Kids or whatever) that was worth the initial pain/backlash.
I’d also be glad for a risk (TFA was way too safe) as long as it followed the logic of the universe established before.
Further, there always were force sensitive kids being born, that never stopped. They could have gone in that direction at any point, no?
Only difference was they couldn’t use their powers without training before.
True, there are a lot of "revolutionary" concepts in TLJ that ain't so revolutionary. And my biggest beef is that these setups should have come at the end of the trilogy, not in the middle.
I’d also be glad for a risk (TFA was way too safe) as long as it followed the logic of the universe established before.
Further, there always were force sensitive kids being born, that never stopped. They could have gone in that direction at any point, no?
Only difference was they couldn’t use their powers without training before.
I’d also be glad for a risk (TFA was way too safe) as long as it followed the logic of the universe established before.
Further, there always were force sensitive kids being born, that never stopped. They could have gone in that direction at any point, no?
Only difference was they couldn’t use their powers without training before.
How "liberalating" lol that sounds...Where's the fun in that.. Training, preparation, bah, that's for pussies...
Aren't all the Mutants & Inhumans in the Marvel universe born with mastery over their powers? So why not in Star Wars too?
No need for character development, nor for a hero's journey... That's old school thinking.. It's simple today. "I'm here, therefore I am"...
These Star Wars threads are pure gold.
Who knew glorified toy ads were taken this seriously.
These Star Wars threads are pure gold.
Who knew glorified toy ads were taken this seriously.
Enter your email address to join: