Damn thats ****ing sad
Even sadder is that they weren't even Han, Luke, and Leia but Dan, Jake, and Mary Poppins
Damn thats ****ing sad
Just agreeing with this, overall. And with some comments off Reddit. One of which basically points out however u may feel about TLJ, there was a focus/narrative of sorts; and more importantly, characters are given time to actually TALK to each other in a thoughtful way. Rey and Luke, for example. I don't think TLJ is the worst of the ST; rewatched TROS finally last night and while there are some good moments; for me it gallops across the screen (no pun intended) with run-on scenes, Mcguffins, fake deaths, fake sentiment, and generally wastes the actors who are working hard, but can't save a bad script/narrative/re-hash. Plus a lot of the film is just plain murky; unlike some visually amazing scenes in TFA and TLJ. Dunno how someone like Driver pushed through stuff like "Your parents were trash who sold u etc." "No, scratch that, my bad, ur actually Force royalty" or Hamill put up with all the whiplash of his character.
So yeah, I'd agree the PT is better than the ST; whatever flaws there might be; it's a cohesive, consistent arc with spectacular imagination. Unlike films done by committee. Also, by ROTS, work had been done to improve narrative etc. Which is what I thought would happen with TROS - yeah, there were some efforts here and there like Rey training; but too little too late and then JJ stuffing as much as he possibly could into the film and all the re-hash. IMO there IS so much good with the ST. But so much got thrown away - the ST are some of the most frustrating films I will ever see, because of what might have been.
Even sadder is that they weren't even Han, Luke, and Leia but Dan, Jake, and Mary Poppins
Lol how anyone can like that portrayal of Luke and say Lucas is the one who destroyed the franchise is delusional. PT had stupid moments but Leia flying throw space like some frozen marry poppins was without a doubt the stupidest thing i've seen from a Star Wars.
This is so eight pages ago.
This is so eight pages ago.
This is so eight pages ago.
Right, I don?t know what is so confusing about it.
Vader the most well known iconic villain in cinematic history was ruined in the PT.
That didn?t happen with Luke in the ST it just didn?t happen and he certainly acted better than HC that?s for certain.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
....What! Luke was destroyed in the ST. Damn your so blind it?s hilarious. That?s the biggest gripe people had. Even hamil.
You ok with green titty drinking Luke? Defeated Luke who runs.
O I forgot. My OT characters are here so I have to force myself to love it. Damn it?s like a cult mentality.
You know deep deep deep within yourself it was trash but your afriad your Disney overlords will burn your HT OT collections before your eyes
The PT ruined Vader, Fett, C-3PO, Yoda, etc.
The ST ruined Luke, Han, Leia, Lando, etc.
The only two characters from all three trilogies that are pretty much survived the past 4 decades unchanged is probably Palatine and R2-D2. Though, the sequels definitely cucked R2 in favor of BB-8, which is kind of sad.
Then again, TROS ruins Palpatine by association with Rey, so hell, throw him in the ruined category as well.
The PT ruined Vader, Fett, C-3PO, Yoda, etc.
The ST ruined Luke, Han, Leia, Lando, etc.
The only two characters from all three trilogies that are pretty much survived the past 4 decades unchanged is probably Palatine and R2-D2. Though, the sequels definitely cucked R2 in favor of BB-8, which is kind of sad.
Then again, TROS ruins Palpatine by association with Rey, so hell, throw him in the ruined category as well.
....So at the end of the day . No ones happy. Damn it?s good to be a Star Wars fan
The PT ruined Vader, Fett, C-3PO, Yoda, etc.
....
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: