Poor man has lost his fedora again.
Poor man has lost his fedora again.
I stopped reading right there. Worthless site. Worthless opinions.
The claims you make are so outrageously silly I don't feel it's worth it to "explain" why they're wrong. You're trying to pick a fight with anyone who doesn't like the prequels or Terminator: Genisys...what more needs to be said?Are you incapable of explaining your opinions or do you just laugh at others?
I'll take it over anonymous SSF member who likes the prequel trilogy and Terminator Genysis...no offence, seriously.
The claims you make are so outrageously silly I don't feel it's worth it to "explain" why they're wrong. You're trying to pick a fight with anyone who doesn't like the prequels or Terminator: Genisys...what more needs to be said?
Out of all the mistakes they made with Anakin in the prequels, that "NOOO!" was one the most awkward and out-of-character. It was corny to the point of being comical and embarrassing. It's just more cringe-worthy prequel garbage, simple as that. I figure anyone with common sense can see that.
Luke's "NOOO!" was far more realistic and emotional. It felt like a natural reaction and it wasn't dragged out for what seemed like an eternity with Vader's. It wasn't perfect acting by any means, but it was believable - especially considering the circumstances - losing his arm and learning that Vader is his father.
He WAS until the prequels came along and gave us this:
Anyone who bothers to take the time to do that has serious issues (and not just with the prequels!)
Oh, and ROTJ gave us a "conflicted" Vader, not just pure evil. Pure evil is scarier but less interesting.
ROTS showed us the source of that conflict, he fought his dark impulses right up till the last, and was still a reluctant convert to the Sith.
So, mentioning I like Genysis once is bad? Then asking why others hated it. This is now bad and worth bringing up? Never defended the movie either... just said I liked it as a casual fan.
******** stupid. It really is ******** stupid.
That's a pretty cool pic of older Han Solo right there.
So, mentioning I like Genysis once is bad? .
I'm with you on this.Excited is an understatement.
I don't expect this movie to recreate 1977-1983. If you didn't see those in the theater you wouldn't understand. There's no way it can it's not possible. What this movie CAN do is become an acceptable sequel to the originals we all love. And if it does ONLY that, i will be more than satisfied.
(But i think were in for a little more)
I'm with you on this.
Unfortunately, it was ROTJ, so we got the "tell, don't show" version of this. Luke says he can sense the good, but we never see Vader do anything out of character, like question the emperor. It's not until Luke is getting run through the bugzapper that he finally steps up and acts. It would have been nice to actually see some conflict, instead of Luke just saying he can sense it.
Vader spares Piett in ESB. Great foreshadowing of his redemption in my opinion. He also spared Luke in that fight. Her could have easily killed him. I think they did a decent enough job for a fairy tale story to show the villain's conflict? Could it have been better? Perhaps. But it's good enough. Even with RotJ being the weakest of the OT, Vader's redemption is my favorite scene of the whole saga.
I always thought Han was too much of a tryhard pseudocool, like if it was George Lucas' own definition of "cool guy".Han looking as suave as ever.
Has any actor ever returned to a roll 32 years later other than HF?
I'm drawing a blank.
Has any actor ever returned to a roll 32 years later other than HF?
I'm drawing a blank.
Enter your email address to join: