That was the first one that popped into my mind. I could go on but you are clearly knowledgeable enough about Star Wars to know that we would be here for awhile...heck I am sure that 4 or 5 other examples probably popped into your head as you were replying to mine...Star Wars is awesome...but its reliance on overwhelming suspension of disbelief, coincidence, and some general story telling silliness did not start with TLJ.
Yes, there have always been contrivances, physics bending (and breaking) elements, questionable military tactics, and so on in Star Wars. However, speaking only for myself, whenever a contrivance pops up in a new film I tend to ask "is it any more offensive than what Lucas did with the OT?" And if the answer is no (which it often is) then I let it slide. If the answer is yes, then it tends to rub me the wrong way. So it isn't about demanding that new films be airtight with regard to characterizations, physics, or contrivances, it's just about the degrees.
A lot of TLJ's supposed shortcomings actually *do* get a pass from me simply because those same shortcomings can be attributed to the OT. For instance I've seen people complaining about Rey going through all these dark events in Snoke's throne room and then "suddenly" she's all smiles and enjoying herself blasting TIE's with the Falcon's turret guns. I guess I could let that bother me except for the fact that Luke was all smiles ("I got him!") sitting in *that exact same chair* after one of his last remaining friends in the galaxy got sliced down just minutes before. So I don't really sweat it in TLJ.
Other aspects of TLJ I *do* think were either ill-conceived or they stretched things too far and that's where my criticisms come in. It doesn't mean I hate the film or am outraged or want other people to hate it, only that I view it as a mixed bag with more good than bad, just like ROTJ.
Last edited: