punisher1974
Super Freak
Snoke was probably too busy doing the Snoke Poke with Maz Kanata
Star Wars: The Last Jedi (Dec 15th, 2017)
- Thread starter CallMeTheDoctor
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
jye4ever
Broke and happy
lol @ iron
I have no expectations for this film, that way I won't be disappointed by it not living up to some crazy standards in my head. Hype and expectations usually = unhappy movie goer
Glad you all like the idea.....someone should have consulted me about the script. I only would charge 100k for my screenplay.
Honestly , I think they were trying to show the Empire in shambles , and the first order rising from the ashes....they just appeared to rise pretty damn quickly. Especially having a super weapon already made.
They may have done a bit better showing some kind of alliance from another faction (similar to the Hutts) that allowed them to rise again. Perhaps even an element within the New Alliance that defected...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Honestly , I think they were trying to show the Empire in shambles , and the first order rising from the ashes....they just appeared to rise pretty damn quickly. Especially having a super weapon already made.
They may have done a bit better showing some kind of alliance from another faction (similar to the Hutts) that allowed them to rise again. Perhaps even an element within the New Alliance that defected...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mr. Green
Super Freak
LOL, these movies are notorious for character losing limbs. Mr. Green lost some kind of limbs just watching it.
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,717
- Reaction score
- 19
No thanks. I love me some Luke, but the natural progression of this story is for "Excalibur" to be passed down. The Lionheart must die so the legend can live on.
The future of SW rests in the hands of Kylo and Rey (The Greys).
ShadowX81
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2010
- Messages
- 4,464
- Reaction score
- 239
The Lionheart still has life left in him.
I hate Hollywood's trend of making it so that anyone who isn't in their 20s anymore has to clear out and "pass the torch" down to the next generation.
Star Trek made multiple movies with the original cast. Why can't Star Wars do the same?
jye4ever
Broke and happy
I think you're missing the point with what Disney is doing.
They want to guarantee future earnings with a new younger cast but to do that they first had to pay alot up front to bring in the OT cast.
They were definately running out of time look at Carrie.
Besides do you really want to see old farts doing full on action, Harrison was limping for christs sake lol grant it he was injured.
What I don't like is that in an effort to "insulate and protect" the OT story line they went and did a crappy job explaining away that 32 year gap.
They want to guarantee future earnings with a new younger cast but to do that they first had to pay alot up front to bring in the OT cast.
They were definately running out of time look at Carrie.
Besides do you really want to see old farts doing full on action, Harrison was limping for christs sake lol grant it he was injured.
What I don't like is that in an effort to "insulate and protect" the OT story line they went and did a crappy job explaining away that 32 year gap.
Last edited:
I do not think they need to preserve the old cast to hand down the story to a new cast. And I do not think that mean the new cast should not be expendable. I think it would be a bold move to kill of Finn or Poe or even Kylo or Rey, so long as it furthered the story on a new and interesting way.
Granted it seems the best financial decision to move to younger actors, but honestly , Carrie did not die because she was older, she died due to drug abuse, an all too common problem this day WITH the younger crowd! Take a look at the death in recent years and you easily can see many of the were under 50.
I doubt any studio really thinks I this way when writing a story that much. I am sure the insurance agents working for them do.
Any one of these actors could meet their demise at anytime.
I believe after these 3 films Disney will toss the new actors aside for side stories and origin type stories.
It's cheaper to use totally new and relatively unknown talent. Does this mean the end of the serial SW films? No, but I think we will see new characters and actors every 3 films.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Granted it seems the best financial decision to move to younger actors, but honestly , Carrie did not die because she was older, she died due to drug abuse, an all too common problem this day WITH the younger crowd! Take a look at the death in recent years and you easily can see many of the were under 50.
I doubt any studio really thinks I this way when writing a story that much. I am sure the insurance agents working for them do.
Any one of these actors could meet their demise at anytime.
I believe after these 3 films Disney will toss the new actors aside for side stories and origin type stories.
It's cheaper to use totally new and relatively unknown talent. Does this mean the end of the serial SW films? No, but I think we will see new characters and actors every 3 films.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
EVILFACE
Insufferable S.O.B.
Ropen
Super Freak
You know, its the 40th anniversary and i have not seen anything that much significant from star wars
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jye4ever
Broke and happy
No one knew better about CF drug use than Lucas/Kennedy/OTCast they knew very well she could go at any second hence why all her scenes were shot first lol.
What did you expect? The world shuts down for a week to celebrate?
Force Friday is one week away -- that's likely the extent of it, besides a lot of 40th Anni stickers on things.
EVILFACE
Insufferable S.O.B.
It will be shutting down for the 42nd Anniversary.
The Clown Prince of Crime
Super Freak
Hasbro had some figures, including a new Vader mold.
Kim Jong-un is a big Star Wars fan. Maybe he has a surprise for us.
EVILFACE
Insufferable S.O.B.
MiniMe Death Star?
- Status
Similar threads
