Terminator Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Just finished reading the script. Oh boy, it's gonna be the dumbest thing ever... MUST SEE!

But seriously, it's like G.I. Joe movies with Arnold. Trashy as ****.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Oh Sweet Baby Jesus, even Emilia Clarke's ass (or that of her body double) can't save this movie.

Terminator_Genisys_-_Poster.jpg

Imagine dev doing this for two hours. :lol

Nicolas_810637_217077.gif
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Just finished reading the script. Oh boy, it's gonna be the dumbest thing ever... MUST SEE!

But seriously, it's like G.I. Joe movies with Arnold. Trashy as ****.

You got a link to the script? I gave up looking a few days ago.

Oh Sweet Baby Jesus, even Emilia Clarke's ass (or that of her body double) can't save this movie.

View attachment 163786

Imagine dev doing this for two hours. :lol

Nicolas_810637_217077.gif

Tempted to photoshop that to 'Reset The Franchise' or 'Reset The Spellchecker'...
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Watched T2 for the first time in quite a while. Man, it's amazing how good a job Cameron and Arnold did at retaining the "machine" aspect of the T-800 even with some of the more light-hearted aspects. Right off the bat in the biker bar when he demands the guy's boots and clothes and the dude says, "You forgot to say please." Well we already know that the idiot from T3 and probably Genisys would have awkwardly said "Please." You know, talk to the hand, okay, and all that. But the Terminator just stands there, not seeing any reason to follow up with a response. The guy damages his skin, he breaks his hand, mayhem ensues. The whole fight (while sanitized compared to the thugs in T1) is sitll pretty brutal and far from "comedic."

And just ignoring the aspects of how they changed the tone of the T1 story and so forth I really found Arnold's "Uncle Bob" to be quite likable throughout the movie. He REALLY does act like a machine for so much of the movie that when he does pause and play high five or make some comment it really is a genuinely amusing change of pace. Even his "Stay here, I'll be back" is quite a low key delivery. Not "Stay here, I'll BE BACK HAR HAR HAR wink wink!"

At the end of the movie it really starts to feel like Arnold is coming "alive" and emoting and caring for John ("John, you've got to go NOW,") but at the end they really convey that tragically it was all just his programming, that he never felt anything at all. When he hugs John he is clearly going through the motions, when Sarah shakes his hand and nods at him he responds to the gesture but turns his head and steps onto the hook as if her sentiment didn't register at all.

BRUTAL.

I had to chuckle watching the final brawl between Arnold and the T-1000 remembering that someone who's a part of Genysis recently said "The opening fight between the two T-800's is going to be so much better than when Arnold fought Robert Patrick." Yeah, never the best idea to say, "our action is gong to be so much better than when James Cameron did it." :lol
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Watched T2 for the first time in quite a while. Man, it's amazing how good a job Cameron and Arnold did at retaining the "machine" aspect of the T-800 even with some of the more light-hearted aspects. Right off the bat in the biker bar when he demands the guy's boots and clothes and the dude says, "You forgot to say please." Well we already know that the idiot from T3 and probably Genisys would have awkwardly said "Please." You know, talk to the hand, okay, and all that. But the Terminator just stands there, not seeing any reason to follow up with a response. The guy damages his skin, he breaks his hand, mayhem ensues. The whole fight (while sanitized compared to the thugs in T1) is sitll pretty brutal and far from "comedic."

And just ignoring the aspects of how they changed the tone of the T1 story and so forth I really found Arnold's "Uncle Bob" to be quite likable throughout the movie. He REALLY does act like a machine for so much of the movie that when he does pause and play high five or make some comment it really is a genuinely amusing change of pace. Even his "Stay here, I'll be back" is quite a low key delivery. Not "Stay here, I'll BE BACK HAR HAR HAR wink wink!"

At the end of the movie it really starts to feel like Arnold is coming "alive" and emoting and caring for John ("John, you've got to go NOW,") but at the end they really convey that tragically it was all just his programming, that he never felt anything at all. When he hugs John he is clearly going through the motions, when Sarah shakes his hand and nods at him he responds to the gesture but turns his head and steps onto the hook as if her sentiment didn't register at all.

BRUTAL.

I had to chuckle watching the final brawl between Arnold and the T-1000 remembering that someone who's a part of Genysis recently said "The opening fight between the two T-800's is going to be so much better than when Arnold fought Robert Patrick." Yeah, never the best idea to say, "our action is gong to be so much better than when James Cameron did it." :lol

I got the impression he really did care for John, that was the point. By being given free will, he'd started to evolve into a higher order of artificial intelligence capable of processing emotion. Unfortunately he also knew he'd have to be destroyed to protect John from ever being subjected to the Judgment Day future.

Agree on everything else though, I showed the film to a friend who'd never seen it before recently back-to-back with T1 and he didn't realise until the shopping mall sequence that Robert Patrick was the villain. While he never visibly kills anyone in that biker bar (maybe the one who gets thrown through the window?), I always wince when he throws the guy onto the stove. As you say, brutal.

It's a brilliant film that's aged like fine wine for the most part. If they honestly think they're going to top Cameron and Winston's crew in delivering visceral, seamless special-effect-driven action scenes - on a PG-13 rating, no less - they must be ****ing delusional.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

I got the impression he really did care for John, that was the point.

Interesting. I took the movie as saying that he could never truly care for John, despite how authentic his learned surface mannerisms might appear.

I showed the film to a friend who'd never seen it before recently back-to-back with T1 and he didn't realise until the shopping mall sequence that Robert Patrick was the villain.

And that's why even in all of my "bashing" I've never been able to write this movie off. When I saw T2 opening night in the theater I didn't know that Patrick was the villain either since I deliberately avoided the trailers. It was one of the most amazing twists I'd ever seen in a movie.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Interesting. I took the movie as saying that he could never truly care for John, despite how authentic his learned surface mannerisms might appear.

In the original draft of the screenplay (and if I remember rightly, the novelisation based upon it), the T-800 does self-terminate. Sarah asks him if he's afraid and he replies 'yes' as he turns and leaps into the molten steel.

And that's why even in all of my "bashing" I've never been able to write this movie off. When I saw T2 opening night in the theater I didn't know that Patrick was the villain either since I deliberately avoided the trailers. It was one of the most amazing twists I'd ever seen in a movie.

When I realised as a teenager that the film was set up so that if you knew nothing about it beforehand you'd assume Arnold was the villain once again, it took the whole thing to a new level for me. Brilliant filmmaking.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Watched T2 for the first time in quite a while. Man, it's amazing how good a job Cameron and Arnold did at retaining the "machine" aspect of the T-800 even with some of the more light-hearted aspects. Right off the bat in the biker bar when he demands the guy's boots and clothes and the dude says, "You forgot to say please." Well we already know that the idiot from T3 and probably Genisys would have awkwardly said "Please." You know, talk to the hand, okay, and all that. But the Terminator just stands there, not seeing any reason to follow up with a response. The guy damages his skin, he breaks his hand, mayhem ensues. The whole fight (while sanitized compared to the thugs in T1) is sitll pretty brutal and far from "comedic."

And just ignoring the aspects of how they changed the tone of the T1 story and so forth I really found Arnold's "Uncle Bob" to be quite likable throughout the movie. He REALLY does act like a machine for so much of the movie that when he does pause and play high five or make some comment it really is a genuinely amusing change of pace. Even his "Stay here, I'll be back" is quite a low key delivery. Not "Stay here, I'll BE BACK HAR HAR HAR wink wink!"

At the end of the movie it really starts to feel like Arnold is coming "alive" and emoting and caring for John ("John, you've got to go NOW,") but at the end they really convey that tragically it was all just his programming, that he never felt anything at all. When he hugs John he is clearly going through the motions, when Sarah shakes his hand and nods at him he responds to the gesture but turns his head and steps onto the hook as if her sentiment didn't register at all.

BRUTAL.

I had to chuckle watching the final brawl between Arnold and the T-1000 remembering that someone who's a part of Genysis recently said "The opening fight between the two T-800's is going to be so much better than when Arnold fought Robert Patrick." Yeah, never the best idea to say, "our action is gong to be so much better than when James Cameron did it." :lol

:lecture <- I could not post enough of these so I'll just leave it at one.

This is what I've always been saying in defence of T2. The world of the movie and the T-800 itself were written and played in a plausible way where I could believe it and take it seriously as the same world and the same type of machine as in the first film. For me it only differed in that A) obviously the T-800 didn't kill anyone and B) his flesh didn't seem to start rotting as it did in T1, they kept him looking ''cool'' the whole time rather than making him look scary and zombie like.

And agreed on the ending - ''I know now why you cry but it's something I can never do'', all due respect to Plastic Bateman, but I think that was the T-800 using a metaphor rather than meaning that he literally couldn't cry because of no tear ducts. He has to have tear ducts to keep his eyes moist just so they don't shrivel and rot from his head, so I doubt that's what he was meaning. Rather I believe he couldn't cry because he was incapable of feeling emotion. He could only learn 'about' emotion and understand the circumstances in which a human would be happy or be sad. And he learned the right things to say and the right gestures to make - hugging John, shaking Sarah's hand - but as Khev said he was really just ''going through the motions''.

There's only one thing that makes me doubt this interpretation and that is that in a deleted part of the script Sarah was supposed to ask ''are you afraid?'' and he was to respond ''yes''...apparently. That would have been awful IMO - and it seems it's the direction they're taking it with T:Genisys. However I'd love to ask Cameron what his true intention was at the end of T2.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

:lecture <- I could not post enough of these so I'll just leave it at one.

This is what I've always been saying in defence of T2. The world of the movie and the T-800 itself were written and played in a plausible way where I could believe it and take it seriously as the same world and the same type of machine as in the first film. For me it only differed in that A) obviously the T-800 didn't kill anyone and B) his flesh didn't seem to start rotting as it did in T1, they kept him looking ''cool'' the whole time rather than making him look scary and zombie like.

And agreed on the ending - ''I know now why you cry but it's something I can never do'', all due respect to Plastic Bateman, but I think that was the T-800 using a metaphor rather than meaning that he literally couldn't cry because of no tear ducts. He has to have tear ducts to keep his eyes moist just so they don't shrivel and rot from his head, so I doubt that's what he was meaning. Rather I believe he couldn't cry because he was incapable of feeling emotion. He could only learn 'about' emotion and understand the circumstances in which a human would be happy or be sad. And he learned the right things to say and the right gestures to make - hugging John, shaking Sarah's hand - but as Khev said he was really just ''going through the motions''.

There's only one thing that makes me doubt this interpretation and that is that in a deleted part of the script Sarah was supposed to ask ''are you afraid?'' and he was to respond ''yes''...apparently. That would have been awful IMO - and it seems it's the direction they're taking it with T:Genisys. However I'd love to ask Cameron what his true intention was at the end of T2.

I believe it was Cameron's intention to show that the Terminator had evolved to the point of having emotions, otherwise Sarah's speech about a machine learning the value of human life would ring pretty hollow.

I always took the 'it's something I can never do' line to refer to the Terminator not being physically designed to do so, implying that he understands why John is crying and empathises with him. The Terminator does genuinely care for John, but knows he must be destroyed to give him the chance at a brighter future.

Just listen to the music from that scene, it says it all really.



Really, the fact that this is even open for debate indicates that Cameron handled it perfectly. It's so subtle and nuanced, unlike everything we've seen from Genisys so far.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

In the original draft of the screenplay (and if I remember rightly, the novelisation based upon it), the T-800 does self-terminate. Sarah asks him if he's afraid and he replies 'yes' as he turns and leaps into the molten steel.

Ah, so you knew about that.

Yeah, it's dodgy, I don't like it. Glad they removed it.

But Cameron's reason for not filming it could be key. I'd love to know, can't remember if he ever said.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

The only way that you terminator purists are going to get what you want would be for Cameron to A: write the script himself, and B: him direct it himself. There are too many other variables, points of view and opinions in this mix for it to be anything like those first two movies. That's just how it is sadly.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

I believe it was Cameron's intention to show that the Terminator had evolved to the point of having emotions, otherwise Sarah's speech about a machine learning the value of human life would ring pretty hollow

Yeah that's another good one to draw attention to. However you could just take that as Sarah projecting her own emotions and sentimentality onto the T-800. Which is what I've always taken it as. Again, I'd love to know Cameron's intention there.

My main problem with a T-800 capable of feeling emotion is that it goes against the portrayal in T1 and some of Kyle Reese's memorable dialogue - ''It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear...'' or even the movie tagline which went along similar lines.

Maybe it can be rationalised, like Kyle Reese was ''just a grunt'' - he evidently didn't know anything about a T-1000 being sent to 1995 so it's not unreasonable to assume he didn't have full knowledge of a T-800's learning capabilities - but, while I readily accept the former, I'm more reluctant to accept the latter - just from a preference standpoint.



Really, the fact that this is even open for debate indicates that Cameron handled it perfectly. It's so subtle and nuanced, unlike everything we've seen from Genisys so far.

Agreed sir.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

The only way that you terminator purists are going to get what you want would be for Cameron to A: write the script himself, and B: him direct it himself. There are too many other variables, points of view and opinions in this mix for it to be anything like those first two movies. That's just how it is sadly.

Not true, for me at least. I can think of several directors who could potentially make an amazing Terminator movie, and several writers who could provide them with an amazing script.

The problem is that Terminators 3 and 4 were handled by also-ran action directors and written by notorious hacks Brancato and Ferris. This latest instalment comes from the minds that gave us Dracula 2000 and its two direct-to-video sequels, Drive Angry and various TV pilots, and is being directed by someone whose only notable previous credits are Game of Thrones episodes and Thor 2.

Now if this was Neill Blomkamp's Terminator from a script by him and his District 9 co-writer, I might be legitimately excited.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Not true, for me at least. I can think of several directors who could potentially make an amazing Terminator movie, and several writers who could provide them with an amazing script.

The problem is that Terminators 3 and 4 were handled by also-ran action directors and written by notorious hacks Brancato and Ferris. This latest instalment comes from the minds that gave us Dracula 2000 and its two direct-to-video sequels, Drive Angry and various TV pilots, and is being directed by someone whose only notable previous credits are Game of Thrones episodes and Thor 2.

Now if this was Neill Blomkamp's Terminator from a script by him and his District 9 co-writer, I might be legitimately excited.

You make some good points on others making a good movie, but unless it's Cameron, It will never truly have the same feel.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

You make some good points on others making a good movie, but unless it's Cameron, It will never truly have the same feel.

Which is why in my mind anything past Terminator 2 was just a drug-induced hallucination I had once :lol

Seriously though, I'd be down for a update of the series by some hungry young talent - but the key words there are 'hungry', 'young' and 'talent', not 'comfortable', 'middle-aged' and 'hack'.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Yeah that's another good one to draw attention to. However you could just take that as Sarah projecting her own emotions and sentimentality onto the T-800. Which is what I've always taken it as. Again, I'd love to know Cameron's intention there.

My main problem with a T-800 capable of feeling emotion is that it goes against the portrayal in T1 and some of Kyle Reese's memorable dialogue - ''It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear...'' or even the movie tagline which went along similar lines.

Maybe it can be rationalised, like Kyle Reese was ''just a grunt'' - he evidently didn't know anything about a T-1000 being sent to 1995 so it's not unreasonable to assume he didn't have full knowledge of a T-800's learning capabilities - but, while I readily accept the former, I'm more reluctant to accept the latter - just from a preference standpoint.

Or Reese was unwilling or incapable of ascribing emotions to the enemy, as in any war.
 
Re: Terminator: Genisys (July 1st, 2015)

Watched T2 for the first time in quite a while. Man, it's amazing how good a job Cameron and Arnold did at retaining the "machine" aspect of the T-800 even with some of the more light-hearted aspects. Right off the bat in the biker bar when he demands the guy's boots and clothes and the dude says, "You forgot to say please." Well we already know that the idiot from T3 and probably Genisys would have awkwardly said "Please." You know, talk to the hand, okay, and all that. But the Terminator just stands there, not seeing any reason to follow up with a response. The guy damages his skin, he breaks his hand, mayhem ensues. The whole fight (while sanitized compared to the thugs in T1) is sitll pretty brutal and far from "comedic."

And just ignoring the aspects of how they changed the tone of the T1 story and so forth I really found Arnold's "Uncle Bob" to be quite likable throughout the movie. He REALLY does act like a machine for so much of the movie that when he does pause and play high five or make some comment it really is a genuinely amusing change of pace. Even his "Stay here, I'll be back" is quite a low key delivery. Not "Stay here, I'll BE BACK HAR HAR HAR wink wink!"

At the end of the movie it really starts to feel like Arnold is coming "alive" and emoting and caring for John ("John, you've got to go NOW,") but at the end they really convey that tragically it was all just his programming, that he never felt anything at all. When he hugs John he is clearly going through the motions, when Sarah shakes his hand and nods at him he responds to the gesture but turns his head and steps onto the hook as if her sentiment didn't register at all.

BRUTAL.

I had to chuckle watching the final brawl between Arnold and the T-1000 remembering that someone who's a part of Genysis recently said "The opening fight between the two T-800's is going to be so much better than when Arnold fought Robert Patrick." Yeah, never the best idea to say, "our action is gong to be so much better than when James Cameron did it." :lol

KzsFFnJ.gif
 
Back
Top