- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,921
- Reaction score
- 4,801
Spot-on, a-dev. It always circles back to this for me: fan theories and speculation is part of Star Wars and it's good fun, but it requires a real-world suspension of disbelief.
There was no plan, there is no continuity. George was winging it.
There was no plan, there is no continuity. George was winging it.
JAWS is bang-on correct in these posts.
TLJ Luke is a problem for me. But it's a problem that originated in TFA which in turn copied what became one of the most questionable aspects of the OT - the issue regarding Obi-wan and Yoda sitting on their arses - which in turn really became a problem only after the PT was made and we saw how badass they both could be.
When Yoda is picked up by Bail Organa in that speeder in ROTS and he says ''into exile I must go'' it was jarring as **** to me in light of everything I'd just seen. If I was a character in the movie and I'd witnessed that battle (hypothetical - I know Bail did not witness the fight) I'd be saying to Yoda ''Errrr....you must go into exile after that one evenly matched fight beeecaussse...reasons? You're clearly the best hope for defeating the Emperor'' And if I later found out that Obi-wan had defeated Anakin I'd be even more encouraged. Why the **** have you both decided to cut and run?
Anyone who has a problem with Luke in the ST should equally have a problem with Obi-wan and Yoda of the PT deciding to take themselves out of the fight.
You can't say it was so they could train Luke because they weren't even training him. They waited till Obi-wan became elderly and till Yoda became even more elderly. They waited till Luke was 20 - which was too late by PT rules - and only certain happenstance events even seemed to bring Luke to Obi-wan in any case. I don't get the impression from ANH that Luke was in regular contact with the guy he knew as Old Ben. Meanwhile the situation had gotten much worse because the Emperor had strengthened his armies, fleets and hold over the galaxy and developed the Death Star. We're supposed to believe they thought Luke was going to fare better against all of that than they could have against the early Empire? As far as they knew at the time Vader was out of the picture and there wasn't yet any planet-destroying superweapon. Seems to me they had much better odds than Luke.
And remember they were expecting Luke to kill Vader and the Emperor - if they weren't confident that they could do it - 2 jedi masters/accomplished war generals - what possible hope did they think a single farmboy-turned jedi trainee had?
And there's no indication in the OT that they were anticipating what actually happened - Luke turning Vader back to the light and Anakin killing the Emperor. Obi-wan is dismissive when Luke says there is good left in Vader and he practically blackmails him when Luke says he can't kill his father - ''then the Emperor has already won''.
Either both PT and ST are at fault or neither of them are and you just roll with it. I choose to ditch both myself. The OT standing on its own has less problems. There are still questions - but I'll take the questions over the movies that not only failed to answer those questions in a satisfying way but compounded the problems and made them glaringly worse.