Shoot, I'm starting to feel like I've got a little bit of "tears in rain" going on here, like I'm just some punk replicant on a rooftop spouting crap that will soon be forgotten in this this big never ending storm of animosity against the prequels.
But here goes...
I dunno. Forgive me if I'm interpreting you wrong but if you're saying ''just accept and enjoy the crap'' well
Okay, fair observation. I can totally see how you might think that and would wonder why I'd bother. Kind of like if I said "Hey Battlefield Earth, if I go through the movie frame by frame there's actually one or two milliseconds that don't suck, let's all watch it and accept it and talk about it now." Ha. Yeah that'd be pretty strange. So let me give you some points of reference as to where I'm coming from, and if you disagree with *these* then yeah, I might as well be championing Battlefield Earth. They are:
1. I have a ton of respect and affinity for any backstory that was scribbled down before or during the OT. I think there was just pretty much "magic" in all of it. So when I read about Trader Barons and shipping embargos that cause planets to crumble which leads to Palpatine rising to power to calm an outraged Republic suddenly anything that touches on that becomes kind of cool. Not awesome, or perfect or even "good," because execution of a concept IS important, but at least it ties into sound backstory that I'm into and just want to see play out on screen in some fashion.
By the same token when I read that one synopsis a while back that had a Jedi defending his little kid on Tatooine from this badass Sith then suddenly the Maul/Qui Gon fight on Tatooine as Anakin runs away takes on a cool new resonance. From what I guessed, Lucas had this scene of a Force sensitive kid out in the desert wilderness and he is tracked down by a Sith. Right as the Sith is about to kill him the kid's dad shows up with a lightsaber and fights off the attacker. Then it kind of seemed like that moment evolved into Luke being attacked by Sandpeople and then being rescued by Ben, but then many years later Lucas went back and kind of gave us a version in TPM that had some elements that more closely matched his original vision.
So to recap I just like anything from those notes brought to fruition. And if I can trust that ALL OF IT is based on those notes, well then I can almost give a pass to the whole damn trilogy. But I know that that wasn't the case and that he did make up a number of new things seemingly out of the blue.
2. Since 1981 the OT has always been "4, 5, and 6." So it's not like he had this sweet story with no real backstory and then in the late 90's just contrived a way to make a lot more money and jarringly went decades into the "past." The episode numbers always foreshadowed the day that the prequels would come. Because of that, *in my opinion* the OT lacked a sense of completion. It felt like it was missing something that it clearly wanted to have.
Yes it started off with Luke becoming an adventurer for the first time and we all took his journey with him. And the OT does indeed tell the "story of Luke Skywalker" and you don't really need "prequel movies" about characters other than him to enjoy HIS story. You just don't. But as a "saga" it just positioned itself as having something more. We got so many references to things like the Jedi Order, the Senate, the Clone War, and so on. References don't have to be fully explained and they often help convey that there's a whole universe out there that goes way beyond what you're watching.
But with regard to Star Wars we kind of just knew that 1, 2, and 3 and 7, 8, and 9 were going to be a big deal at some point. For a while after ROTJ I never thought we'd see new SW again. And then the prequels happened. And now we have the "sequels" coming. What if 7, 8 and 9 just kill it. KILL IT. And they reference Battle Droids and *gasp* even midichlorians. Well, then we've got our saga. And if this thing wraps up well then we're going to have one heck of a 9 episode story that really just stuttered in the execution of it's opening act. But not necessarily irredeemably so.
3. As I've mentioned some of the stuff in the PT, even AOTC and ROTS is genuinely cool. And if you disagree on that then yeah, I'm telling you to give "Battlefield Earth" a chance. I just think that if the "cool" elements had a little more credibility, or perhaps were *allowed* to have a little more credibility then they'd be embraced by a lot more people. I think back to when I watched the SW SE opening day in 1997. I was BLOWN AWAY when Boba Fett walked on screen. I COULD NOT BELIEVE that he had a scene in Star Wars with Jabba that was left on the cutting room floor. Immediately all these things "clicked" in my mind. "Oh that's why he's the one action figure to debut on the previous movie's Kenner card. That's why he was on the 21 back, because he was always supposed to be there!" And then my mind went to all the cool implications of him being on Tatooine and bla bla bla.
Then I read that he was just digitally inserted into that scene when they made the SE and suddenly I got all pissed and thought it was stupid that instead of being this badass bounty hunter who was all over the galaxy he was just Jabba's dumb "lackey" and oh look he's mugging for the camera and it was nuts! The SAME scene that I thought was so cool was just "stupid." All because I had to sit in judgment of the motivations for why he was there. I could no longer enjoy it. I had to second guess every little detail all of a sudden. But that made me realize that I wasn't allowing myself to let these movies tell me the story. *I* had to cross reference every little detail with what *I* knew to be cool and proper about SW and sit there like Joaquin Phoenix with my thumb up or down.
And I'm not saying that any of you guys do that but for me that's just really dumb. Because I know, I *know* that if somehow Lucasfilm Ltd released some verifiably authentic manuscript that was 30 years old that detailed how George Lucas, Gary Kurtz, and Lawrence Kasdan envisioned Boba Fett being a clone of this guy named Jango, and that Anakin and "Padme" had this really awkward romance and that were all these cartoon pod racers I just know that I'd look at things differently. So I just thought, "well why the hell don't I just choose to look at things differently?" The stuff on screen doesn't change, only what I will "accept."
Because that's what I do with Return of the Jedi. It has dumb stuff. It has awkward scenes in front of 2D backgrounds (that Falcon painting, *shudder.*) ANH has goofy parts that you can make fun or be turned off by. I'm not saying that AOTC and ANH were executed with the same level of skill. Far from it. I'm just saying that if I want to have something more than "the story of Luke Skywalker and his dad," which I do, then I should AT LEAST watch the PT with the same mindset as that I give to ROTJ.
And that allows me to be less annoyed (or not annoyed at all) by the "story choices" that are kind of goofy or outright lame like Anakin building C-3PO or the existence of midichlorians. Because I don't see THOSE elements as defining the saga. Who built what droid? How do Jedi talk to the Force? As long as there's still faith, training, and displine involved then whatever if there's these weird microscopic creatures that sometimes play a part. Not really the point of the saga.
Which then gets you to execution of the story. Well, we all seem to agree that TPM is the best of the prequels. So lets move on to the "worst," AOTC. Well, John Williams score is still sweet is it not? The sports bar scene was pretty cool wasn't it? "Jedi business, go back to your drinks." Not bad right? That's something I could see Vader saying when he was still a Jedi. Jango, cool. Fight in the rain with Obi-Wan, cool. Clonetroopers had neat designs. Christopher Lee? Awesome to see in a SW movie. Yeah, it's the weak link. But as far as dismissing it altogether and saying "that's not the real history," well, why? It had clones in a war. It had Palpatine pulling strings. It had Anakin falling in love and starting to turn kind of bad. It basically featured stuff that we were all kind of expecting but just, well, it just didn't present it very gracefully. James Cameron called Alien 3 a "beautiful failure." I think AOTC was an "ugly *** win."
You know? It didn't kill off everyone from TPM in the opening scene but it also didn't do a great job of making us love everyone who DID survive. But it moved the story and you either think there's enough cool stuff in there to give it a watch or not.
If you say "there is not" well, you're definitely in the majority but I do think that the broad strokes of the story were sound.