Things I Hate

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
No, it implies there was a cycle.

Personally, it's nonsense. They're looking for a beginning to something without one. Their best answer is that it expands and contracts; not how it started, and as Khev pointed out, it needs an impetus. Really, they're no further than the speculations of the Pre-Socratic philosophers.
 
We prolly will never know how the Universe was created. But that is better than just saying one of the thousands of invisible deities created it and put a end to probing any further.
 
I don't think end, but eventually all the stars will use up their fuel making the universe a dark cold void. Several billion years from now.
 
I think there was more than enough separating IV from VII to not call it a remake. Rogue One was good, but the dialogue was a mess, the nods to '77 were more hamfisted than anything in VII, and Cassian was lame.

Wicked lame.
 
"We prolly will never know how the Universe was created. But that is better than just saying one of the thousands of invisible deities created it and put a end to probing any further." - EF

awesome, couldnt have said it better.
 
All the ads for the **** heads wanting to be the next District Attorney in Philly. The last one lost the position due to corruption, and the next one will do exactly the same thing since the city is so incomprehensibly corrupt.
 
"We prolly will never know how the Universe was created. But that is better than just saying one of the thousands of invisible deities created it and put a end to probing any further." - EF

awesome, couldnt have said it better.

Figuring it all out would be brilliant. But science can't get there from a foundation of agnosticism. Creation is an easy question once you realize the question is not valid. Everything cannot be made from nothing. Existence exists. There is no alternative to everything. It has no before or after. Time is a relative concept and there is nothing relative to everything. It is. That's what it does. It can't be explained because there is no explanation. The question is silly.

Science needs to grow up if it's going to explain what it is. Growing up would require leaving explanations of why it is to the poets and the preachers.
 
All the ads for the **** heads wanting to be the next District Attorney in Philly. The last one lost the position due to corruption, and the next one will do exactly the same thing since the city is so incomprehensibly corrupt.

Most elections these days are between crap and poop....or Giant ****** and Turd Sandwich.
 
I think there should be a television special where Devilof76, Stephen Hawking, and Neil Degrasse Tyson drink beer and shoot the s***.
 
Figuring it all out would be brilliant. But science can't get there from a foundation of agnosticism. Creation is an easy question once you realize the question is not valid. Everything cannot be made from nothing. Existence exists. There is no alternative to everything. It has no before or after. Time is a relative concept and there is nothing relative to everything. It is. That's what it does. It can't be explained because there is no explanation. The question is silly.

Science needs to grow up if it's going to explain what it is. Growing up would require leaving explanations of why it is to the poets and the preachers.

Great post. I agree 100%. Matter is neither created nor destroyed. :lecture
 
I know the truth about our existence. If you'd like me to tell you where we came from, PayPal me $10.
 
No, I'm talking about earth and the universe.


You interested Mr. Green?
 
Back
Top