BadMoon
Demi G0D Overseer
Nope, not buying this console or their nonsense.
Yeah sorry, I worded that badly, I meant that MS only cares about the people around the world who play Halo and CoD 24 hours a day, and I believe both those games have the most players in the U.S. It's clear they aren't concerned with anyone else, as the mandatory connection proves, and we all know for a fact many people won't be able to connect every day. I'm with you all in thinking no game system should lock a person out for any amount of time, simply because they can't access the internet, it's ludicrous.I don't know man, US sales are around 1/4 of the worldwide sales aren't they?
Anyway, in case you haven't seen this, Angry Joe's really entertaining.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryB-hdtpQRw
Yeah sorry, I worded that badly, I meant that MS only cares about the people around the world who play Halo and CoD 24 hours a day, and I believe both those games have the most players in the U.S. It's clear they aren't concerned with anyone else, as the mandatory connection proves, and I know for a fact many people won't be able to connect everyday. I'm with you all in thinking no game system should lock a person out for any amount of time, simply because they can't access the internet, it's ludicrous.
IGN
Can I play my friend's games on my console?
NO, not unless you're signed in as them. Otherwise you will have to buy that game yourself. Even if your friend leaves the disc with you, you can't play it unless you buy it.
The clearest stance on this comes from Eurogamer's interview with Harrison: "I can come to your house and I can put the disc into your machine and I can sign in as me and we can play the game. The bits are on your hard drive. At the end of the play session, when I take my disc home - or even if I leave it with you - if you want to continue to play that game [on your profile] then you have to pay for it.
The bits are already on your hard drive, so it's just a question of going to our [online] store and buying the game, and then it's instantly available to play. The bits that are on the disc, I can give to anybody else, but if we both want to play it at the same time, we both have to own it. That's no different to how discs operate today."
Microsoft's Major Nelson (Larry Hyrb) put it this way: "Should you choose to play your game at your friend’s house, there is no fee to play that game while you are signed in to your profile." But then if you go home and leave the disc with your friend, they will have to pay for that game if they want to play it on their own profile.
just makes you think who did Microsoft hire or let Plan these awful ideas for their next gen console? and how did they let it pass as a final product.
It's not really Microsoft who wanted this, it's the publishers EA, Ubisoft Activivision etc. In my opinion MS is playing ball so that they can get the big exclusives from them in the hops that they can win games over with the timed DLC or exclusive DLC or games, the problem with that is the 360 and PS3 kind of exploded in terms of numbers of games (Ghosts will make 9 Call Of Duty games on this gen) so people became more inclined to buy used or trade in and just when people started getting used to it they want to take it away and they've lost a lot of good will from the gaming community. If Sony are doing something similar then the exclusives may help, if they don't then all the exclusives in the world may not save them.
I don't know about that. Microsoft controls the platform and built the infrastructure. I don't recall publishers calling the shots. Then again, I'm not in the gaming industry so I do not know what actually happens behind the scene. I guess we'll see who's controlling what when PS4 reveals their licensing scheme. If it is indeed the publishers pulling the strings then I do not see how Sony can bypass the same licensing scheme that Microsoft is implementing.