Wow!! That bottom pic (of just the helmet) is the best I've ever seen
any HT Vader mask look.
In fact, comparing this RO helmet to ESB movie Vader makes it even more impressive. All I had to do was rotate your pic a tiny bit.
View attachment 424176
And just to further illustrate how spot-on so many features look, here's the same comparison with some straight lines added to show how the proportions line up. The biggest differences are the chin vents/grill and how huge the neck of the HT RO helmet is compared to ESB movie Vader (but those things are actually accurate to the RO movie Vader that it represents - so not flaws by HT).
View attachment 424178
I'm still frustrated by some of the inaccuracies of the previous HT Vader helmets. But when I read people post that the new ESB Vader sculpt is improved over those previous HT efforts, I get so confused. Please understand that I'm not trying to be a smartass here; I'm genuinely confused and curious when I ask this. What is it about the new ESB helmet that is in any way an improvement over the helmet shown above?
The best I've seen the new ESB figure look is in the photo that IndyMOS took and was posted here yesterday. I added it to the comparison below. The angles don't match, but it's at least close enough to get some sense for how things like the nose and mouth (in particular) are further from accurate than the RO mask. And HT's placement of the dome on this figure just baffles me; it's all kinds of wrong.
View attachment 424177
I feel like some people are seeing something that I'm failing to pick up on. To anyone who thinks the ESB helmet is an improvement in sculpt over the previous HT offerings: please help me understand. Is it something that only shows up from the front, or at some other angle?
Again, I need to make clear: I am
not trying to provoke or be a troll here. I'm just genuinely curious what it is that I'm missing.