- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 9,686
- Reaction score
- 283
1/6 Hot Toys - MMS195D1 - Iron Man 3: Iron Patriot Diecast Series Official Specs/Pics
- Thread starter ThatIsTooReal
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
GearheadSS
Freaked Out
Cell phone charger? Nice! 
That is the biggest phone charger i have ever seen and probably the most expensive
Niltusk
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 12,599
- Reaction score
- 50
You know, when I first saw this, I'm like, cool...
then I see the cell phone charging part and is it just me, or does that seem to make the whole thing tacky?
Chr0n0
Super Freak
And the award for the most random product goes to...
kanine
Super Freak
That is going to be one expensive cell phone charger.
dw316
Super Freak
Do you mean like what they did with the Mk7?
Oh yeah! I also hope they fix the attachment of his gun so it goes over his head while in flight... Well here's to hoping anyways...
The only difference between IP and WM is the paint job and HS.
That can be done with WM, so I can't imagine that IP will be any different
great, so we just need the in flight HS/neck. i wonder how many peeps r going to b selling their WM2 once this is out... if u put this next to WM2 side by side, my eyes will tend to wander IP's direction.. so much presence!
bransen2099
Super Freak
I don't think anyone would sell their WM MKII's. Some countries already dnt like the Americanism that Captain America is and IP is just as patriotic, pun intended. WM offers a nice neutral color scheme.
Plus, both are great figs. I don't see why one wouldn't just keep WM MKII buy the IP, and possibly regret later that he didn't keep the first.
I already thought about it and said I didn't need WM, just the Patriot since I still got the first WM.
Plus, both are great figs. I don't see why one wouldn't just keep WM MKII buy the IP, and possibly regret later that he didn't keep the first.
I already thought about it and said I didn't need WM, just the Patriot since I still got the first WM.
Invictus Sol
No Life in the Void
I bet the red and blue will really pop, in-hand, but overall I just find IP too flashy. I love two-tone greys/silver and blacks, so WM MK II is perfect to me. Definitely I can see the appeal of IP, though. Just not for me.
Yoshi
Super Freak
I wasn't really keen on his colour scheme to begin with. Wasn't planning on picking him up at all but I did enjoy his roll in the movie. The governments "red, white and blue attack dog." Also that the suit was used by the villains too. Still can't get my head round why they never used the shoulder cannon in the movie either.
I really like "flashy" on my shelf... & i think im gonna have to dig FA Cap outta his storage box & pair the two. I rather enjoyed him on IM3 & was glad we saw more of him. On the Next IM, I wonder how Marvel is going to tie in the story with Norman Osborne since he's already been killed by Tobey spidey.
The Rage
Super Freak
There won't be any mention of Norman, or Spider-Man, because they rebooted that franchise, and because Sony owns the screen rights to Spider-Man. Neither of them will tie into the Avengers stuff unless Sony and Disney sit down and work out a deal.
bransen2099
Super Freak
I don't see how Sony messed it up??? Marvel sold the filming rights to Spiderman and his supporting cast and it is Sony's right to make those movies anyway they want, but only limited to Spiderman character's. Raimi's Spider-Man came out in 2002, who knew that Osborn would become the Iron Patriot in 2009's Dark Avengers series.
It isn't Marvel fault either because when they were selling the movie rights to their character, at that time they were unable to produce the films themselves which wasn't until 2008's Iron Man.
Both Sony and Marvel have to work within the legal boundaries of eachother's filming rights. The inclusion of IP in IM3 fitting into the story they were trying to fit. And Sony is only interested in the Green Goblin aspect of Osborn, I highly doubt they will have him running H.A.M.M.E.R. By the time we get to Amazing Spiderman 5.
It isn't Marvel fault either because when they were selling the movie rights to their character, at that time they were unable to produce the films themselves which wasn't until 2008's Iron Man.
Both Sony and Marvel have to work within the legal boundaries of eachother's filming rights. The inclusion of IP in IM3 fitting into the story they were trying to fit. And Sony is only interested in the Green Goblin aspect of Osborn, I highly doubt they will have him running H.A.M.M.E.R. By the time we get to Amazing Spiderman 5.
Similar threads
