Wow that is some good freaking company right there. Closing in on Raiders.
EG is no Raiders though..
Adjusted for inflation is bull****. There were less movies then, no internet, no streaming, endless content to watch, no cinematic video games, 24 hours sports, dvds, home theaters, piracy...etc. No wonder old movies made so much money. Tickets cost less, there was nothing else to watch, and if you missed it....gone...in the wind.
Yeah. $2.8 billion with no cultural footprint whatsoever.
I'm guessing it'll stay at #1 as a permanent reminder that that film even exists, lol.
Yeah the three lasting reminders of Avatar since 2009 are:
1. Box office
2. 3D
3. Suicidal weirdos who wanted to be able to live on Pandora
Nothing about the story or characters or even the general quality of the visuals and special effects.
I almost lol'd at my LCS today when I walked in the door and saw this TPB front and center. Here you go JAWS:
View attachment 453566
Let me put it this way.. My kids go to way more movies then I ever did. Its just easier.
Yep and I'll even go so far as to say that it's still a genuinely good movie that is watchable even today.
But with regard to pop cultural impact? Man, just nothing. Nothing at all.
If it had made $400 million domestic/$800 million globally then I think it would have a lot more respect. Then people could say yep Cameron delivers another solid flick. But to have made such staggering amounts of unprecedented profits with *no* lasting iconic characters, drama, or action sequences. It really taints it IMO and even invites certain amounts of ridicule.
I saw a video saying "come on people AEG has the benefit of 11 years of buildup, Avatar made all its money with just one film. Look at IM which started the MCU and didn't make a fraction of Avatar's earnings."
And to that I say well yeah except most non-comic readers had no idea who Iron Man was before 2008 and even though it didn't make as much as Avatar the names "Iron Man," "Tony Stark," "I am Iron Man," etc. were all instantly household names/phrases. Same with the various members of GotG becoming instant icons in 2014 and so on. Movies didn't used to need decades of sequels to become memorable and Marvel reminded everyone of that with just their first few films.
They have more options...not just one big movie. Not just movies, Netflix, cable, streaming, internet, video games that are as cinematic as anything in theaters. There's just more content than ever.
Ignore that, jaws. Remember the good times.
So I was curious about Marvel's "big three." After googling the phrase, all the photos show, Cap, IM and Thor. There are threads dedicated to the subject too. The consensus seems to be that in the fictional Marvel main universe, Cap, IM, and Thor are the most popular and most respected heroes, hence why character's like Spidey looks up to Tony Stark and geeks out when he's around CA. However, in our universe, meaning real life, the big three prior to the MCU, were Spidey, Hulk and Wolverine, as far as mainstream popularity, comic book and merchandise sales. They were seen as A list characters, unlike the other 3 characters. However, now in 2019, after 10 years of the MCU, there's no question that IM, CA and Thor are A-list, mainstream characters. The same could be said about other MCU characters, such as Thanos, Black Panther...etc. Regardless, as far as the Avengers team goes in the fictional universe of comics and now the MCU, the "big three" are IM, Cap, and Thor. Sorry, Hulk.
There is truth to the fact that AEG is being rewarded for its 11 year buildup.. No question. 22 films / 11 years. Yep never been done.
the big three prior to the MCU, were Spidey, Hulk and Wolverine, as far as mainstream popularity, comic book and merchandise sales.
Oh yes of course. AEG's $350 million opening wasn't because the entire world was curious about who these unknown characters were in the trailer in white suits walking slo-mo across a warehouse, they came to see the follow-up to IW and the conclusion to the MCU as we knew it. I was simply countering the notion (perpetuated elsewhere, not here) that we shouldn't compare Avatar to AEG and should only compare it to IM since they were both the first films in their respective series. And to that I say IM still comes out ahead if you're talking about pop culture impact and iconography.
[...]
The movie and RDJ took it too a cultural phenom though.. That's for sure.
Seriously does anyone even care about Avatar anymore?
Makes Sense. You get the movies you are gonna get the fame.
Damn you Universal
My son asked to go see that Pokemon crap, hell no!
I only knew there was a character I'd seen on comic book covers and t-shirts called Iron Man. I barely knew what he was, never mind whom. RDJ is a phenomenon. I don't think anyone else could have done it. With that said, I was relatively slow to get on the MCU train. I didn't see most of Phase 1 in theatres.
Enter your email address to join: