Two sucked, they better of stayed away from that kind of story. This one looks pretty decent. Nothing will top the first though.
The approach was just so much different than the first film. I still liked it though.
Two sucked, they better of stayed away from that kind of story. This one looks pretty decent. Nothing will top the first though.
2 took a chance. It gets points for that. No matter what silly people say
2 took a chance. It gets points for that. No matter what silly people say
Thank you. I prefer 2 personally, I find the mythology of their Heavy Metal Magazine style badass pulp sci-fi universe really fun so it was cool to see it explored. I hope they sneak some of that into the new one too but I'll take whatever Riddick we can get.
Riddick was fun. It's a B-Movie. Which was refreshing. Way better then Man of Steel. .
1, 3 and 2. And I like 2. But 3 was clearly superior.
I disagree ( at least with the first part of your post ) , although "Chronicles.." failed to find an audience , it was a brave attempt to make a S.F film which was unashamedly that and not a comedy/action/western DISGUISED as S.F , like most of todays blockbusters . Yes it was big , overblown and more than a little pompous , but it was like an S.F novel put on the screen.
I loved this movie. I went in expecting it to be a carbon copy of Pitch Black, but it was new and refreshing enough to stand on its own merit. This is just a really fun movie. Not really thought provoking. Just action and one-liners and monsters. I go to the movies for stuff like this. Pure fun. I'm really hoping this movie does pretty well. I'd love to see them do another one.Riddick still needs to get kill Vaako.
Enter your email address to join: