Two sucked, they better of stayed away from that kind of story. This one looks pretty decent. Nothing will top the first though.![]()
The approach was just so much different than the first film. I still liked it though.
Two sucked, they better of stayed away from that kind of story. This one looks pretty decent. Nothing will top the first though.![]()
2 took a chance. It gets points for that. No matter what silly people say
2 took a chance. It gets points for that. No matter what silly people say
Thank you. I prefer 2 personally, I find the mythology of their Heavy Metal Magazine style badass pulp sci-fi universe really fun so it was cool to see it explored. I hope they sneak some of that into the new one too but I'll take whatever Riddick we can get.
Riddick was fun. It's a B-Movie. Which was refreshing. Way better then Man of Steel..
1, 3 and 2. And I like 2. But 3 was clearly superior.
I disagree ( at least with the first part of your post ) , although "Chronicles.." failed to find an audience , it was a brave attempt to make a S.F film which was unashamedly that and not a comedy/action/western DISGUISED as S.F , like most of todays blockbusters . Yes it was big , overblown and more than a little pompous , but it was like an S.F novel put on the screen.
I loved this movie. I went in expecting it to be a carbon copy of Pitch Black, but it was new and refreshing enough to stand on its own merit. This is just a really fun movie. Not really thought provoking. Just action and one-liners and monsters. I go to the movies for stuff like this. Pure fun. I'm really hoping this movie does pretty well. I'd love to see them do another one.Riddick still needs to get kill Vaako.