The Skrulls, like Galactus and Surfer are attached to the FF license though.
I wonder how nitty and gritty the breakdown details are exactly. Clearly something slipped through the cracks or something with Scarlett Witch and Quicksilver. I mean what made them double dipable? I would think there are some lesser known characters and villains that could be argued to belong to a certain franchise or two. I mean technically Wolverine started out as a Hulk bad guy. Hulk has fought Rhino before too. And who hasn't fought Dr. Doom before? Everyone from Spider-man to Dr. Strange. Why couldn't they be used in similar fashion? I think knowing some of the specifics like that could be really fascinating and enlightening. Although I bet someone thought it was very boring when they wrote up the contracts
I dunno. I think we would have seen the skrulls pop up by now if Marvel had them too. Fox clearly has no intention of using them anytime soon
But that is a good example. There have been some big cross over storylines featuring the skrulls. They would seem to me be one of those that could be a shared character property in theory anyway.
Of all the movie trailers shown in front of CA2, this got the best response out of the audience. Hope it s as good as CA. Very excited for this.
Wanda and Pietro were both Avengers when the deal was done. I'm betting that's how the "joint usage" plays into things. As far as Wolverine, I'm betting his exclusivity was the selling point to get FOX to bite at the deal.
But who hasn't been an Avenger by this point?
.... The punisher
Although he did dress up like Cap once, sorta...
Enter your email address to join: