Star-Crunch
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 9, 2017
- Messages
- 2,747
- Reaction score
- 462
Sure, I wish it was more accurate, but I’m happy with it. I just don’t want to order and then get stung with a battle damaged version.
Huh, I guess it's a revised sculpt after all. Definitely like it better than the earlier one.
View attachment 459036
View attachment 459037
So what am I missing here? From their original figure release it clearly says additional accessories (plural) coming soon, and the TS head sculpt is already there. Improving its design doesn't add to the accessory count. And adding detail to the forearms that they missed the first go around doesn't do that either. I also really thought they'd go the IW route and make the right arm a plug-in type so they could give us an entire forearm that could light up along with the gauntlet. The gauntlet being a separate hand piece was expected but they're getting really cheap on us if that's all we're receiving.
View attachment 459048
Thought it would be a light up arm with the time they took...
I don't know if it's all as simple as that. I would say they are using a common under-skeleton for all their recent ironmen which does not have removable arms.
I also don't think HT would have been informed of the Iron Man Gauntlet by Disney a long time in advance, due to secrecy. Therefore for HT to make mods to the existing or creating a whole new skelton with removable arm in the time they had is a pretty big ask.
Perhaps they looked at the whole figure with all options they had and decided the best way to go both technically + costwise was to make the Gauntlet just for the hand.
I'm no HT defender, but just looking at it from a neutral position I could see that being a feasible scenario as to why we have what we have.
While you are correct about one image, it does say “accessories” on iron mans pic. Maybe it is just the glove, and maybe a accessory pack. But the implication ...
Oh we'll get that arm.
I don't know if it's all as simple as that. I would say they are using a common under-skeleton for all their recent ironmen which does not have removable arms.
I also don't think HT would have been informed of the Iron Man Gauntlet by Disney a long time in advance, due to secrecy. Therefore for HT to make mods to the existing or creating a whole new skelton with removable arm in the time they had is a pretty big ask.
Perhaps they looked at the whole figure with all options they had and decided the best way to go both technically + costwise was to make the Gauntlet just for the hand.
I'm no HT defender, but just looking at it from a neutral position I could see that being a feasible scenario as to why we have what we have.
So looking at stills from the Endgame Blu-Ray trailer, it seems that when Tony snaps, the time stone actually isn't on his hand. Heck?
So looking at stills from the Endgame Blu-Ray trailer, it seems that when Tony snaps, the time stone actually isn't on his hand. Heck?
Enter your email address to join: