Re: Hot Toys The Last Jedi Rey 1/6 Figure
This.
...and stop watching Game of Thrones.
This.
...and stop watching Game of Thrones.
Looks like an elf.. I just can't get into this actress.
Yeah I noticed that as well. It doesn’t mean that Kylo isn’t extending his hand out to Rey, but those particular scenes don’t look like they really match up even though they have similar lighting. It makes me wonder though who IS Kylo reaching out to? Looking forward to finding out.
I still believe he's reaching out to Rey - his soft facial expression, the upturned palm... It makes most sense if it's Rey - or *maybe* Leia, but I think the chances are much higher it's Rey. Even if the shot of Rey doesn't match.
Rey and Leia are certainly high possibilities. Especially Rey like you said. I also think it could be Luke that he’s extending his hand to. If they go the route where Ben is redeemed and turns back to the light, he could be reaching to Luke to join forces again.
And if it is Rey, it might not be that Rey is turning to the darkside like what they’re implying, but again that he’s joining her. The way they cut it in the trailer though could be meant to mislead us as to who’s joining who. I think they’re definitely throwing us off in some way. No way they’d give away such a spoiler like that. Would they?? Lol.
As far as the figure goes, looking forward to seeing the promo pictures. I wonder if it’ll come with a light-up arm?
Leia survives (no spoiler - it was widely reported when CF died that she had a larger role in Ep IX,) so it's likely he tries to kill her (if the Kylo's fighter/Leia intercut of the trailer is to be believed) then doesn't.
Would seem pretty funny if he kills Dad in VII then kills Mom in VIII, right?
As I said, if this has been deliberately cut together to be misleading, to me that's scummy and crossing a line.
By all means show someone saying a line to someone unseen and let audiences guess who it's being said to, but don't take two unrelated shots from two different scenes (that happen to look visually similar) and cut them together to specifically infer something that is false. That's just lame if Kylo and Rey are in fact interacting with different people in those shots.
Does Kylo kill Han though? Or did Solo turn the lightsaber on himself to 'save' his son as Leia requested.
We never do see who ignited it as such.
That would make the story take a very different path. He wants to be evil but he isn't for reasons as yet unexplained.
Chances are it was Kylo (Ben), but if it was Han it would give his exit from the saga real gravitas.
Interesting (old) theory. But suicide + Disney = big NO NO. Also in the novelization, it explicitly states Kylo ignited the saber.
Does Kylo kill Han though? Or did Solo turn the lightsaber on himself to 'save' his son as Leia requested.
We never do see who ignited it as such.
That would make the story take a very different path. He wants to be evil but he isn't for reasons as yet unexplained.
Chances are it was Kylo (Ben), but if it was Han it would give his exit from the saga real gravitas.
The chances of a major American corporation in any way showing a hero figure committing suicide (except in a heroic self-sacrifice cliche), a character who murders family being redeemed, or an apparently heroic central character turning bad, are roughly nil. Received thinking on all of those would be that it's seen as too controversial by the PR wonks, and/or detrimental to merchandising.
Against that, however, is that the Vader narrative was described by Lucas as his "tragedy", exactly that fall from grace. But, equally, the Mouse wasn't in charge then.
All that being said, I've been in the "Kylo will turn out to be 'good', Rey will go off the rails" camp ever since seeing TFA.
I'm of an unpopular opinion here. I actually believe it would have been for the better to exclude that. It was far too dark, and I literally cannot bend or twist my understanding of Anakin's character to understand how he was capable of that atrocity. It's just another example of a loose end that was unceremoniously cut at the end of ROTS.This is sadly true. There's so much money wrapped up in this now that there's almost no chance Disney goes for something different here. They're probably terrified about offending anyone and risking revenue. I think if Disney had made Revenge of the Sith, there wouldn't have been the youngling scene or any mention of Vader killing children. Which I believe added to weight of his fall, so it's thematically relevant.
I'm of an unpopular opinion here. I actually believe it would have been for the better to exclude that. It was far too dark, and I literally cannot bend or twist my understanding of Anakin's character to understand how he was capable of that atrocity. It's just another example of a loose end that was unceremoniously cut at the end of ROTS.
This is true, but those were the children of murderers. Monsters who killed his mother. The younglings were perpetrators of no such crime, keep in mind Obi wan hadn't "turned" Padme against him at mustafar yet so he really had ZERO reason to be violently angry at the Jedi as a whole.How he was capable? Do not forget he killed children before. Tuskens.
which is just poor writing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: