1/6 Hot Toys - MMS400 D18 - Iron Man 2 - Mark V Diecast Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Wow, nice breakdown there! Everything from the Mk 45 onwards is definitely looking more cartoonish for some reason.

And that Mk 43 is looking a lot cooler than I remember too. I know it's probably not much of a favorite here, but I am starting to like its unique design more and more.
 
Came in the mail today. Beautiful.

AFBD1CDD-FF13-417C-8CE2-11ABCC22E55D.jpg
 
Simple explanation is that more and more effects companies are being used on each movie, and all the really good looking armors you remember were most likely done by ILM or Weta, up through the 43 and Hulkbuster in Ultron, then it becomes a real grab bag of VFX houses, even within any one film.

Weta did the whole IM3 final battle, while Scanline, Trixter, and Luma did some of the earlier Mk 42 shots, which looked fine.

Method Studios did the noticeably off Mark 45 in AoU, that was their first time doing an armor.

ILM did do the CW airport battle, and 46 doesn't look up to their standards imo. They did have to digitally replace basically everything in that scene, so perhaps they couldn't give it the time deserved- everything about CW seems crazy rushed anyway (and ILM didn't do a single other scene featuring the 46 or 47). Method did the silo sequence, they got a bit better there and the darkness helps the shaders not look too computery, but not wild about the animation.

The Mk 50 which looks pretty cartoon in earlier scenes was Framestore (NYC battle) and Cinesite (on the ship with Maw). The 50 looks probably the best in the Titan battle, and that whole thing was done by Weta.

Not all the Endgame VFX breakdowns are out yet, but as far as the 85, Weta did most of the final battle, with ILM handling at least the Captain Marvel sequence. Not sure who did the 2012 Stark tower 85 shots yet (Cinesite did the lobby sequence, Lola and DNEG did Captain v Captain).

click to load photos
Iron Man (ILM)
MkJT4fF.jpg


byGeNMI.jpg


zNB1oZf.jpg


Iron Man 2 (ILM)
RMPSV7s.jpg


nCq846h.jpg


Avengers (Weta)
fwuTVNe.jpg


Avengers (ILM)
glguqqH.jpg


Iron Man 3 (Scanline)
L9piYmm.jpg


Iron Man 3 (Framestore)
AKqJDlM.jpg


Iron Man 3 (Trixter)
zo9dxof.jpg


Iron Man 3 (Digital Domain)
fuBmhR0.jpg


Iron Man 3 (Weta)
YCPyAhj.jpg


Age of Ultron (ILM)
vMNutpu.jpg


Age of Ultron (ILM)
QPPjmdr.jpg


Age of Ultron (Method Studios)
rT4eDUZ.jpg


Civil War (ILM)
PfinZmd.jpg


Civil War (Method Studios)
09otQwo.jpg


Homecoming (Luma)
08FX171.jpg


Homecoming (Digital Domain)
nvAr2Rl.jpg


Infinity War (Framestore)
8kZbmqt.jpg


Infinity War (Cinesite)
y5hTuvc.jpg


Infinity War (Weta)
t0tLN0I.jpg


The 50 really needed to look like this (which is a practical suit with a bit of digital polish), but never got there
xoghViJ.png
YIH4g4L.jpg


By way of a follow up, sounds like ILM did the 85

No images but some info:

https://www.artofvfx.com/avengers-e...technology-supervisor-industrial-light-magic/

How did you enhance the Iron Man, War Machine and Iron Patriot models?
The suits evolve with each and every film. No one knows these suits as well as Bruce Holcomb, who was built or touched just about every Iron Man and War Machine suit over the last ten years. For Iron Mark 85, based off the great art, we got from the team at Marvel, we tried to combine the bleeding edge and nanotech feel of the suit from INFINITY WAR, with a little more of the traditional rigid suit feel from CIVIL WAR. We wanted to keep the nanotech that brings the suit on and off, but try to do it in a way that made it feel a bit more rigid/mechanical. This was true for the Gauntlet as well. It happens quickly, but if you watch carefully, you will see the nano / liquid metal forming the framework and individual panel pieces that then lock into place. This was done to help sell a more physical / less magical feel for the suits. We also introduced some subtle patterning to the materials on the suit to give it some visual interest.
 
First of all, sorry for asking about non-diecast. For those of you who got the first edition of Mark V, does it suffer from the 'pink panty' and would you get the new diecast instead (if available)? Thx

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
 
Chose not to preorder him back then like an idiot. :slap
Decided to just suck it up and get one before the price keeps skyrocketing. Wallet hurts but Mark V does look amazing!

2cda92h.jpg

5oi7g6.jpg
 
Chose not to preorder him back then like an idiot. :slap
Decided to just suck it up and get one before the price keeps skyrocketing. Wallet hurts but Mark V does look amazing!

2cda92h.jpg

5oi7g6.jpg
That pic is dope. Is that the king arts gantry?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
 
First of all, sorry for asking about non-diecast. For those of you who got the first edition of Mark V, does it suffer from the 'pink panty' and would you get the new diecast instead (if available)? Thx

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

There's no pink panty issue with the first release, but if you can swing it definitely go the diecast route. The dimensions, detailing and features are all vast improvements.
 
Hi collectors, I have a chance to buy Mark 5 diecast and Mark 46 at same price. The price is high and I only can buy either 1. Which one should I buy?
Mark 5 mechanical opening area are very soft & easily broken is it?
 
Hi collectors, I have a chance to buy Mark 5 diecast and Mark 46 at same price. The price is high and I only can buy either 1. Which one should I buy?
Mark 5 mechanical opening area are very soft & easily broken is it?

Buy what you want.

Strictly observing each armor, the Mark V is not a full movie hero suit like the Mark 46 but the build is unique and a better looking armor on display because of the build design. If I had other iron men and other main movie Marks then definitely would lead me to get the Mark V. The Mark V has a solid build design and you should not worry about it breaking.

If you are looking to have a representation of Iron Man in your collection and have no other Iron Man Mark suits, then the 46 is a awesome armor and compared to the other hero armors it is definitely up there as one of the most admired

Get which ever fits bets with your wants and your collection.
 
Buy what you want.

Strictly observing each armor, the Mark V is not a full movie hero suit like the Mark 46 but the build is unique and a better looking armor on display because of the build design. If I had other iron men and other main movie Marks then definitely would lead me to get the Mark V. The Mark V has a solid build design and you should not worry about it breaking.

If you are looking to have a representation of Iron Man in your collection and have no other Iron Man Mark suits, then the 46 is a awesome armor and compared to the other hero armors it is definitely up there as one of the most admired

Get which ever fits bets with your wants and your collection.
I would take Mk V, i wanted the civil war mk 46 but i think i would be ok for now for mk 46 concept art which is still available at cheaper price.
Too bad mk 46 concept art does not provide headsculpt like the mk46.
By the way i just got the mk v as well too!! Couldnt wait until it comes nxt week (this hobby is not cheap lol).
 
Hi collectors, I have a chance to buy Mark 5 diecast and Mark 46 at same price. The price is high and I only can buy either 1. Which one should I buy?
Mark 5 mechanical opening area are very soft & easily broken is it?

Yeah I would probably opt for the Mark 5 as well. If you need another all-red armor there's always the Mark 50, but something like the 5 is a lot more unique and would probably stand out more in the collection.
 
Back
Top