Iron Man 3 Discussion Thread
- Thread starter The Mike
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
DinoLast
Super Freak
I never thought Iron Man 3 would have a Batman Forever vibe, but it does.
Aldrich Killian is very much like Edward Nygma, a nerd who is a big fan of the hero, meets hero, feels scorned by hero, transforms into super villain and plots a revenge by kidnapping hero's girlfriend.
I fear that you and I saw a very different movie.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2006
- Messages
- 2,907
- Reaction score
- 1
Can anyone point me in the right direction for spoilers for the after credit scene?
DinoLast
Super Freak
Niltusk
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 12,599
- Reaction score
- 50
Intruder04
Super Freak
I just broke up your quoted post into segments to respond to different points in it.Some of your quotes had wrong authors..weird
Ruffalo & Downey.
pretty much the plot to Ams 2
BB&WSF
Super Freak
Couldn't find it...
SixthScaleEdward
Super Freak
Watched IM3 for the second time. Seeing it in 2D this time made me better appreciate some details.
I also found a Comic Mandarin story plot that matches the movie very much.
The movie didn't deviate that much from the comics.
Upping the score from 8 to 8.5.
I also found a Comic Mandarin story plot that matches the movie very much.
The movie didn't deviate that much from the comics.
I think seeing IM3 for the second time helped me get over the shock of the plot twist as well. Makes it easier to accept Kilian as the Mandarin. I have now accepted that Trevor was just Mandarin's double.
Mandarin was not bastardized by the film, the film simply exhibited the Mandarin's incredible foresight.
Mandarin was not bastardized by the film, the film simply exhibited the Mandarin's incredible foresight.
Upping the score from 8 to 8.5.
Watched IM3 for the second time. Seeing it in 2D this time made me better appreciate some details.
I also found a Comic Mandarin story plot that matches the movie very much.
The movie didn't deviate that much from the comics.
I think seeing IM3 for the second time helped me get over the shock of the plot twist as well. Makes it easier to accept Kilian as the Mandarin. I have now accepted that Trevor was just Mandarin's double.
Mandarin was not bastardized by the film, the film simply exhibited the Mandarin's incredible foresight.
Upping the score from 8 to 8.5.
And totally agree with what you said inside the spoiler tags.. it makes things easier to accept watching it several times.
I really really want a figure of Killian now. I wonder if HT will do it. Given their infatuation with the licence, it's possible. The figure might be hard to do though.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,162
They've made Iron Monger and Whiplash. Mandarin is next, so is Iron Whiplash. I don't see why they wouldn't do atleast Killian and maybe one main Extremeis soldier.
I mean, Hot Toys has made everyone and everything except Potts so far.
I mean, Hot Toys has made everyone and everything except Potts so far.
Seen this on Wednesday!!
Was a great movie!!
Loved Guy Pearce.
Some really good action scenes.
As one who has never read the comics i was totally taken for a spin with the Mandarin-great acting Ben Kingsley!!!
Was a great movie!!
Loved Guy Pearce.
Some really good action scenes.
As one who has never read the comics i was totally taken for a spin with the Mandarin-great acting Ben Kingsley!!!
MitchF1GTR
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 1
Been thinking on the armors being rubbish and came up with this.....
With Mk1-7 (cept 5) the armors needed that big rig to put on and as such were strong as hell as they didn't have many joins between parts.
With the others they were all designed to be put on and taken off simply by opening up meaning lots of hinges and little bits and pieces which no matter how good Stark is they'd structurally be no where near as strong as the pre-IM3 armors.
Yeah?
With Mk1-7 (cept 5) the armors needed that big rig to put on and as such were strong as hell as they didn't have many joins between parts.
With the others they were all designed to be put on and taken off simply by opening up meaning lots of hinges and little bits and pieces which no matter how good Stark is they'd structurally be no where near as strong as the pre-IM3 armors.
Yeah?
I have this theory:
In the real world, the Armour would crush flat when it his something solid(Like a tank shell, for instance...).
But this is movie magic, so these things are incredibly strong. Strong enough to be able to resist ANYTHING, with only flaking paint and a couple of bashed panels(But not in any way to hurt Tony inside).
I can accept the invulnerability of the armours. It's all part of the suspension of disbelief.
With that in mind of course, the fewer parts the armour is made from, the stronger it would be(But the more specialised the system of putting the armour on and taking it off, RE the Gantry). Another thing to do with the strength is that we have seen in this movie and the previous ones that the suits usually have more than one way to put them on or take them off. This would require drastic over-engineering. But i can buy it. Tony is meant to be a genius(And i expect Jarvis has a lot to do with the manufacturing of the suits too). Like, in Avengers Assemble, we see that the MKVII is "transformed" into what amounts to a missile, and can assemble itself onto Tony in mid-air(And in that scene it encloses itself around him from the back). But then in Iron Man Three, we see the MKVII standing on a kerbside and when Tony walks up to it, the *rear* opens up like flower petals to accept him walking into it(One of the coolest ideas in the movie, by the way: The MKVII is parked at the side of the road, next to cars!). I can't imagine an engineer in the real world being able to make the same suit be able to do that, but this is the movies, and i love the idea that the armour is that versatile(I have zero problems imagining that, in addition to those two methods of getting into the MKVII, that Tony could walk out to the gantry walkway on Avengers Tower and the gantry could assemble the MKVII onto him in pieces too, his engineering is that versatile).
These are all just facets of what makes Tony Stark such a genius in the movies.
But, *movie magic time*, i don't think the newer armours are any less strong than the older armours. I just think it points to the fact that the Extremis-powered-soldiers were so badass that they could tear through an Iron Man suit like paper. I can't believe that tank shells, or the Iron Monger, or Vanko's drones, or the Chitauri would damage those suits.
But the Extremis guys were the match of them.
I fully expected the after credits scene to be Tony being injected with Extremis. Or at the very least, working with the formula on his computer and announcing that he had made it stable. I can only expect the next evolution of destroying the armours(And losing his Arc Reactor), is another high energy power source like Extremis.
But this is movie magic, so these things are incredibly strong. Strong enough to be able to resist ANYTHING, with only flaking paint and a couple of bashed panels(But not in any way to hurt Tony inside).
I can accept the invulnerability of the armours. It's all part of the suspension of disbelief.
With that in mind of course, the fewer parts the armour is made from, the stronger it would be(But the more specialised the system of putting the armour on and taking it off, RE the Gantry). Another thing to do with the strength is that we have seen in this movie and the previous ones that the suits usually have more than one way to put them on or take them off. This would require drastic over-engineering. But i can buy it. Tony is meant to be a genius(And i expect Jarvis has a lot to do with the manufacturing of the suits too). Like, in Avengers Assemble, we see that the MKVII is "transformed" into what amounts to a missile, and can assemble itself onto Tony in mid-air(And in that scene it encloses itself around him from the back). But then in Iron Man Three, we see the MKVII standing on a kerbside and when Tony walks up to it, the *rear* opens up like flower petals to accept him walking into it(One of the coolest ideas in the movie, by the way: The MKVII is parked at the side of the road, next to cars!). I can't imagine an engineer in the real world being able to make the same suit be able to do that, but this is the movies, and i love the idea that the armour is that versatile(I have zero problems imagining that, in addition to those two methods of getting into the MKVII, that Tony could walk out to the gantry walkway on Avengers Tower and the gantry could assemble the MKVII onto him in pieces too, his engineering is that versatile).
These are all just facets of what makes Tony Stark such a genius in the movies.
But, *movie magic time*, i don't think the newer armours are any less strong than the older armours. I just think it points to the fact that the Extremis-powered-soldiers were so badass that they could tear through an Iron Man suit like paper. I can't believe that tank shells, or the Iron Monger, or Vanko's drones, or the Chitauri would damage those suits.
But the Extremis guys were the match of them.
I fully expected the after credits scene to be Tony being injected with Extremis. Or at the very least, working with the formula on his computer and announcing that he had made it stable. I can only expect the next evolution of destroying the armours(And losing his Arc Reactor), is another high energy power source like Extremis.
MitchF1GTR
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 1
Well yeah, something that's 3000'C should cut thru almost anything....
And I was disappointed Tony didn't inject himself with his own special version of Extremis (which is what I thought Maya was seeing Stark about). I thought that's what the operating table scene was in the trailers so I was pumped we might have gotten Bleeding Edge at the end of the movie....hopefully he does Extremis himself for Avengers 2 and we get to see him follow the comics.
And I was disappointed Tony didn't inject himself with his own special version of Extremis (which is what I thought Maya was seeing Stark about). I thought that's what the operating table scene was in the trailers so I was pumped we might have gotten Bleeding Edge at the end of the movie....hopefully he does Extremis himself for Avengers 2 and we get to see him follow the comics.
Yeah. He can't be Iron Man without a suit of armour.
I am sure it will be worked out by Joss Whedon, King Of The Nerds in time for Avengers 2.
I am sure it will be worked out by Joss Whedon, King Of The Nerds in time for Avengers 2.
Fisherprice
Super Freak
Just give me the Mark XXXIII.
Similar threads
