Iron Man 3 Discussion Thread

[batfan08]

I just called, it said this number is out of service. Y U DO DISS 2 ME, Jyecat!?!?!?!

 

[batfan08]

Shane Black's Dialoge. How is it.....

Last time I checked, he talks aboutpussy a lot before being found suspended from a tree limb and skinned (that was his character, right?).

 

[jye4ever]

I just called, it said this number is out of service. Y U DO DISS 2 ME, Jyecat!?!?!?!

Sorry, was on the phone with wife.

 

[batfan08]

I know who's more important to you, now. Goodbye, Jyecat. I haz a carry-on with my thingz.

 

[jye4ever]

I know who's more important to you, now. Goodbye, Jyecat. I haz a carry-on with my thingz.

sorry, it was important, my wife was asking if she could invite her stripper friends over to watch a movie.

 

[Adolfo]

sorry, it was important, my wife was asking if she could invite her stripper friends over to watch a movie.

LOL...Who do you think you are?......Ted?

 

[Uncanny Web-Slinger]

I like the fact it might be "seperate" from the other Marvel films

What made IM2 a let down was it had too much preoccupation with introducing SHIELD and other story arcs and the entire end battle was very very lame

I actually think having the story focus on STARK/IRON MAN instead of the "Marvel Universe" is a good thing, but maybe that's just me.

Same here, I want a IM movie not an Avengers prequel/sequel.

It says IRON MAN 3 so i want to see Iron Man and his supporting characters and villains and not a bunch of Avengers or SHIELD people.

Agreed about IM2 and to a lesser extent feel the same way about the end of TFA and SHIELDS presence in Thor, they didn't add anything to the films and it most cases hurt the solo movies imo.

From what i've heard IM3 is all Iron Man which is as it should be.

I'm really hoping the GotG have no connection to the Earth characters until at least the end lf their second movie, throwing in characters from Earth will just mess about their story. Same with Daredevil and Inhumans and lots of other characters if/when they get films, hope they join teams and interact with characters that make sense for their stories and not have Avengers or SHIELD shoehorned in

 

[spindrift]

Agreed about IM2 and to a lesser extent feel the same way about the end of TFA and SHIELDS presence in Thor, they didn't add anything to the films and it most cases hurt the solo movies imo.

Right on- the presence of SHIELD and such is PURE MARKETING -PRODUCT PLACEMENT for the currrent or next Marvel film under the pretext of "linking the films together in the Marvel universe"
Please...

 

[jye4ever]

For years comic fans begged for a cohesive universe, they get it and now they want Superheros to act lone wolf.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

****ing nerds.

 

[CelticPredator]

Last time I checked, he talks aboutpussy a lot before being found suspended from a tree limb and skinned (that was his character, right?).

Yes. But he's done way more films then just Predator.

 

[Uncanny Web-Slinger]

Though movies are a different medium It should translate over as is in the books.

Iron Man movies are about Iron Man characters and villains just like the book is.
X-Men movies are about X-Men characters and villains just like the books
Thor movies are about Thor characters and villains just like the book is
Avengers movies are about Avengers team characters and villains. Just like the book is

Iron Man movies should not have Spider-Man characters or Guardians of the Galaxy villains involved because it's supposed to be about iron Man and his characters.

Simple

Just because it takes place in the same universe doesn't mean other non-title characters should appear in each others movies. Daredevil shouldn't be joining the Guardians just for cohesion same as Iron Fist shouldn't be an X-Man or even meet them more than once a year.

Sure characters crossover for events and certain storylines but in the scheme of time in the title to the time out it's small. Since movies are much shorter the crossover also be very small or non-existant for the first few movies

 

[CelticPredator]

Yeah well, this is a new thing so they're going to keep doing it.

You'll have to deal with it.

And Spider-Man will NEVER EVER EVER be in a Marvel Studios movie because of licensing. So you can stop saying that.

 

[Sachiel]

Where is Hulk? Why Hulk left out? HULK MAD! HULK SMASH!

 

[jye4ever]

Yeah well, this is a new thing so they're going to keep doing it.

You'll have to deal with it.

And Spider-Man will NEVER EVER EVER be in a Marvel Studios movie because of licensing. So you can stop saying that.

The United States of Disney will buy every license.

 

[CelticPredator]

God..they should.

Imagine them doing a Predator movie with The Expendables? And in the end they kill them all so another one doesn't get made? Yes.

 

[Uncanny Web-Slinger]

Iron Man 2 really turned me against Stark, hated his portrayel in that. He looks to be likable once again for IM3 so i'm really looking forward to it as the days draw nearer.

The United States of Disney will buy every license.

Well Sony aint gonna sell Spidey yess but Disney could buy Sony

 

[Darkseed]

Iron Man 2 really turned me against Stark, hated his portrayel in that.

The movie novel portrayed him being border line alcoholic because of his condition which the movie glazed over. I enjoyed the book version of Stark much better....

 

[jye4ever]

The "palladium poison" was obviously a metaphor for booze.

Kids can't see Stark as an alcoholic, but an arcaholic was ok.

 

[Uncanny Web-Slinger]

"Arcaholic"

 

[ironwez20]

�� Was that a spoiler ? Damn I knew this would happen !