- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 291
Of course you do.
Fab, you like TDK over 89'?
I'll agree that the batwing was way cooler then the bat. I still prefer TDKR over 89. Any Nobats movie actually.
89 is just an awesome movie. Very watchable.
I don't like that Batman kills
I don't Like that the Joker is already crazy before he becomes the Joker
I don't like that the Joker killed Batman's parents
I don't like that the Joker somehow knows he killed Batman's parents
I don't like the whole Joker kills people but people come out to see his parade anyways.
I don't like it that the Joker is killed
I don't care for the 30's meets the future look Burton gave it.
I don't like the fact there are basically two Prince Videos
I don't like that everyone in the film other then Bats and Joker have no character.
I know it's an older film but the F/X are bad. No excuse for a film made in 1989 to look that bad. SW was almost 25 years before and did not look like some of the effects in this film.
I do like the first 20 min for the most part. Up until "Wait till they get a load of me" After that the film falls apart. Jack becomes too over the top. When he kills Carl Grism he is scary and wild. After that he is just comic relief. Batman also starts killing people after this moment also.
I understand why many don't like TDKR for being a "bad batman" movie but why does Batman 89 get such a pass.
Fab, you like TDK over 89'?
totally agree...Lotta guys IMHO who love the 89 film first I bet were young at the time in 89.
You just give 89' the love it deserves when people make superhero polls?
I would too.
And this is much more a Shane Black movie than an Iron Man movie.
And this is much more a Shane Black movie than an Iron Man movie.
Of course you do.
Yup, that's what I meant when I said "I would too." I'm an underdog guy as well(not saying 89 is an underdog) but I get what you mean.The Dark Knight and Avengers always win the popularity polls, they're the best of the best really. Sort of pointless to vote on something that's gonna win regardless.
Batman 1989 is good stuff too, even if it's old. For being a 24 year old movie, to generate this much excitement and discussion from folks is pretty damn impressive in my opinion.
Do I think it's "teh best"? No, but at times I might if I'm into it. Same goes for all my other favorite films. I have favorites that are hard to choose from not, "OH MY GOD, #1 EPIC MOVIE OF THE WEEK", ya know what I mean.
It's a great flick, no doubt. It's just typical of nova.^ I'm with you there, sorta. I love Returns. Not more then 89, or any other Batman flick. But it's good.
TDKR Batman kills.
Yes I don't like that
I don't like that Bane isn't the child that escaped da pit.
Big screw up! Agreed.
I don't like that Bruce is involved with the League of Shadows and Talia and coincidentally, big bad Bane.
Does not bother me. However I don't like Talia being in the movie at all.
I don't like that John Blake somehow knows that Bruce Wayne is Batman by looking at his eyes.
Very Stupid I agree!
I don't like the whole Bane blows up an entire stadium and their Mayor and lets criminals loose but they all are subservient to him.
Does not bother me at all. They are bad guys.. Why not.
Better death than Bane and Talia
Not complaining how he dies. I don't like it that he does die. Don't like Two Face, Raz, or Bane Dying either. Could care less about Talia dying.
I don't care for seeing Batman in Spider-Man and the Avengers' city.
Um Ok... Is it just TDKR or all the Nolan Batman's??
. . . can't argue this. But, "Partyman" and the Joker destroying fine art pieces is better than the obnoxious DESHI DESHI chant every time Bane is on screen.
Disagree. I like the theme. Sort of Ruined by the fact that he was not the one to crawl out though.
Vicki doesn't have character? Knox? Grissom? The secondaries are better than ****ing Foley, Miranda Taters, Catwoman's little girlfriend, etc. etc.
But Kyle, Blake, Gordon again were all great. Knox was worthless just took up time to get to know Bruce, Grissom was OK but nothing special. Cat's Girlfriend was as good as Bob. Agree that Foley was awful
Star Wars was made 12 years before it.
My Bad math LOL! Either way I stand by it.
And Batman '89 doesn't have the "benefit" of having a crazy director rereleasing "improved" versions of it every couple of years
Do you mean because it was first it did not have something to improve on?? Just wondering because I don't completely understand this statement
If you look at Star Wars as it was in '77, it's very much dated, especially with that grain. Still great though. Age doesn't hurt these older movies, I love film grain, I love haze, etc.
I love grain also! Death to DNR!! The film grain / Haze does not effect me in the least with Batman.
Yes SW is dated but many of the effects still hold up and much better then Batman. The effects in Batman always looked like bad effects IMO. Even in 89
First 45 minutes of TDKR is boring and nonsensical.
Batman doesn't start "killing" until after the third act (where he finds out who killed his parents). Not 20 minutes.
I just meant that the first 20 min got it right. The rest of the film.... Not so much.
Because it is.
Bruce is frozen in time and as pathetic as ever. He sucks at being Batman (not even learning from his mistakes from the past two films). He's a mess. He quits. He's a liar.
Yes I always had issues with this. Batman would not quit and become a hermit. I guess that was the way they had to make him weak instead of Bane releasing all of Arkham while Batman had a bad cold
You forgot to mention that Batman got back into perfect fighting shape by doing push ups
It's more of a disaster flick and a Howard Hughes biopic and a James Bond love letter than it is a Batman movie.
I guess Hitler didn't like IM3 either You hear that people? If you didn't like IM3, you're just like Hitler
https://youtu.be/TyiiKzuz7W8
More like Hitler is controlled by a bitter sad fanboy.
I guess Hitler didn't like IM3 either You hear that people? If you didn't like IM3, you're just like Hitler
https://youtu.be/TyiiKzuz7W8