jye4ever
Broke and happy
I think there was a logical progression over the three films. Man of Steel seems like the most purely Snyder-esque of the three. BvS seems to have started that way, but Wonder Woman, the bad jokes, and the whole scene with Doomsday seem like studio interference. Didn't he initially want Batman raped there? At least he got to keep his Jimmy Olson death scene and visionary interpretation of Luthor. . .
With JL, the studio interference reached a high point, bolstered by their (financial) success after interfering heavily with Suicide Squad, and seeing that Wonder Woman defied expectations by playing it like a pretty conventional, crowd-pleasing, dare I say Marvel Studios-type superhero film. When Whedon left for personal reasons, they were allowed even more leeway to take the reigns and run with it, inserting Whedon to do a smattering of pseudo-comedic bits like, I'm sure, the scene with Superman racing Flash.
One running theme in all of the films is an attempt to overcompensate for a previous deficiency. In Man of Steel, it was criticism of Superman Returns--not enough of two super human monsters punching each other through buildings. In BvS, it was--not enough of a focus on civilians. In JL, it was--too much Snyder, not enough Feige.
But surely, this one stands out from the crowd as the most different. And I like it more because if it, while also respecting it less
That is truly master class right there you truly own this forum when you post **** like that lol