McCain Shocker!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let me ask you gun owners in fear of home invasion another question- why do you honestly think an armed assailant would want anything but your valuables? Why do you think you can one up them at their own game and shoot them first without endangering yourself or your family? SUrely if a criminal sees you have a gun they will take appropriate actions and take you out just for the fact that you have escalated the threat level on their lives. A home break-in, in most cases, only results in property lose until a criminal feels threatened.

What are you gong to do?? Turn a corner like Jack Bauer and blow their heads off before they see you? :lol Doesn't work like that, especially without the proper training. In fact if you take a self defense course most instructors advise you to run and never try to fight or disarm an attacker because usually it is extremely dangerous and very difficult.
Oh my God, a pacifist liberal trying to tell me about what a person is supposed to do when attacked. What self-defense course are you taking where they are telling you to run away.
 
I think the problem with your thinking lies in the fact that you don't see very far into a problem. Why do we have these enemies in the first place? Start at the root and you will find that violence was never the appropriate answer for our country.
Yea, that dreaded Revolutionary War really got us started down the path to ruin. I knew we should of just kept being good little subjects.
 
I think any responsible person should be allowed to own guns. The key word is responsible. There aren't that many people who fit that description, sadly.:lol:lol:lol
 
Oh my God, a pacifist liberal trying to tell me about what a person is supposed to do when attacked. What self-defense course are you taking where they are telling you to run away.

Calling me names now proves you are lacking ground to stand upon in this debate.


If you are given the opportunity to run away you must first and always take that course before fighting back violently. If you have a chance to get away and you still proceed to use unnecessary force on an intruder you will be held liable for your actions.


Use of force is justified when a person reasonably believes that it is necessary for the defense of oneself or another against the immediate use of unlawful force. However, a person must use no more force than appears reasonably necessary in the circumstances.

"Force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is justified in self-defense only if a person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm."


You should really consider reading the laws you are defending with your pistol sir.
 
Let me ask you gun owners in fear of home invasion another question- why do you honestly think an armed assailant would want anything but your valuables?
Because plenty of armed assailants have done more than just go after someone's valuables, that may be why.:lol:lol:lol
 
Is it wrong that whenever I see the title for the thread I imagine McCain giving a "shocker" :lol
 
I think any responsible person should be allowed to own guns. The key word is responsible. There aren't that many people who fit that description, sadly.:lol:lol:lol

90% of criminal state that Bannister's awesomeness is very valuable :lecture
 
I think any responsible person should be allowed to own guns. The key word is responsible. There aren't that many people who fit that description, sadly.:lol:lol:lol

Best post in this thread... and I'll add own kids as well!!!
 
Because plenty of armed assailants have done more than just go after someone's valuables, that may be why.:lol:lol:lol

Very rarely. If you are talking about rape then accurate statistics done by both law enforcement and the government prove that rape is often and mostly done to people that are already acquainted- not by strangers breaking into your house.

Statistically speaking you have a better chance of being struck by lightning then being raped by an intruder breaking into your home.
 
l_fdb2c005e4e66aea2aa2cf594dc42231.jpg
 
LOLL..NO WONDER AMERICANS FIGHT WITH EVERY OTHER NATION IN THE WORLD, YOU PEOPLE FIGHT BETWEEN YOURSELVES LIKE IDIOTS .....:lol
 
Very rarely. If you are talking about rape then accurate statistics done by both law enforcement and the government prove that rape is often and mostly done to people that are already acquainted- not by strangers breaking into your house.

Statistically speaking you have a better chance of being struck by lightning then being raped by an intruder breaking into your home.
You tell that to my ^^^^^^^ Rory.:monkey2:monkey2:monkey2
 
Very rarely. If you are talking about rape then accurate statistics done by both law enforcement and the government prove that rape is often and mostly done to people that are already acquainted- not by strangers breaking into your house.

Statistically speaking you have a better chance of being struck by lightning then being raped by an intruder breaking into your home.

Statistically speaking, I probably have a better chance of being struck by lightning than having my home broken into period. I am just saying that that is the rationale.
 
Any politician who Karl Rove approves of should send a red flag to the voters, not to mention Sean 'Jesus' Hannity and Bill O.:lol

Hoodonit00, could you provide a source for the article you posted?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top