Me too.
Uh..............................swap out abs for one pose?
The hell is this - Power Pose Mk 3?
The portrait looks okay but not Iron Man 1 Stark to me at all. It will be in the box for life.
There's no justification for it other than them being weird about it and not including it from the start. Them not having it on a figure 7 years ago is a lame and odd excuse to use when trying to defend why this one doesn't have it.You do understand that the first iron man armor, the original mk3 has no ab articulation. So like the first 8 releases did not have any ab crunch that has become this be all end all. (Iron monger, mk1, mk2a, mk2b, mk3reg, mk3bd, mk3 silly things all had no ab crunch. Stop acting like this is some crazy scam where)
And it can do the "iconic" pose that everyone said they wanted the ab crunch for. So exactly what pose are you wanting to do that this can't do?
You do understand that the first iron man armor, the original mk3 has no ab articulation. So like the first 8 releases did not have any ab crunch that has become this be all end all. (Iron monger, mk1, mk2a, mk2b, mk3reg, mk3bd, mk3 silly things all had no ab crunch. Stop acting like this is some crazy scam where)
And it can do the "iconic" pose that everyone said they wanted the ab crunch for. So exactly what pose are you wanting to do that this can't do?
There's no justification for it other than them being weird about it and not including it from the start. Them not having it on a figure 7 years ago is a lame and odd excuse to use when trying to defend why this one doesn't have it.
They were lazy, forgot, didn't bother, etc when putting this figure together from the start and that's probably the real reason for it. Every IM figure since the Mark 4 in 2010 had it and it just looks lazy and unfortunate for a 2.0/3.0 release in 2015 to exclude it. That's all there is too it.
There's no justification for it other than them being weird about it and not including it from the start. Them not having it on a figure 7 years ago is a lame and odd excuse to use when trying to defend why this one doesn't have it.
They were lazy, forgot, didn't bother, etc when putting this figure together from the start and that's probably the real reason for it. Every IM figure since the Mark 4 in 2010 had it and it just looks lazy and unfortunate for a 2.0/3.0 release in 2015 to exclude it. That's all there is too it.
Bitching aside, this is a great looking figure! I haven't started my payments on it yet - how long do I have? (UK).
Enter your email address to join: