whats with all the smack talk about GB2? i dont care what any of you say Ghosbusters II was awsome, scarier and funnier then the original. and this coming from a huge fan of the original. i dont see what the problem is between some fans, the 2nd one IMO was a step up from the original. sure it had more of a kid friendly vibe buit that is a good thing. maybe im just a kid at heart and vulgarity was never my favorite thing about movies. but it was very enjoyable and i thought murray was even funnier the 2nd time around. only thing i remember finding wierd was winston haveing no mustache lol. but other then that, great film. on par with the original, and viggo is such a badass ghost, scarier and more nightmare inducing then ANYTHING in the original GB's. and something about when he is the painting.....just creepy. GB 1 had some little fright moments but it just didnt do it for me with the scares. GB 2 solved that problem, especially scenes with the slime, and that tunnel scene....CREEPY! and murray was practically on fire in GB 2, every line he said was hilarious. i think this was at the hieght of his popularity. in short, i dont see how GB2 was a dissapointment at all, it was fun, hilarious, great special efffects and a different unique story and villian. and i love yanoosh, or however you spell his name LOL. some ppl say it was a rehash, but its not so much rehashing anything as much as simply being a "formula". just like the james bond movies, or the rocky movies. all have similiar plots but different stories all around. you always expect bond to defeat the bad guy, or rocky to knock the other guys lights out, or the GB's to defeat some ghost that wants to rule the world. its a forumla. but thats what makes the movies fun to watch. why fix something if it isnt broken?