Making a successful hockey franchise: A strong nucleus/core is needed by building up through the draft and/or developing ones prospects within one's organization. You then make the appropriate FA signings to enhance a team. Looking to improve your team strictly through the Free Agency Market and via FA signings doesn't necessarily make a team strong right off the bat. Enter pre-lockout and cap era New York Rangers. Meaning that is what I believe has happened here. Almost half of the Florida Panthers team was built through FA signings this past Summer. FA signings are meant to compliment or take away from the roster depending on how well that respective GM signs. They're mediocre in goal with Jose Theodore and Scott Clemmensen in net. Losing Tomas Vokoun hurts. David Booth is a bandaid boy and they still don't have a top tier talent on their roster. Speaking of band-aid boys, they went after Tomas Fleischmann, who by all definitions and meaning of the label "bandaid boy" is one of the biggest red flag players to sign in this league. A blood clot in the lung is serious business. Again, the way GM Dave Tallon went to work seems to be more reminiscent of Glen Sather's work from the pre-cap era vs. what a Ken Holland would do. You build a great fantastic core and let it grow by building out with complimentary players that work and bring out that core's strength. The Panthers at their core are much weaker than any point the Detroit Red Wings were with Holland on board, and (again the Wings) made the appropriate FA signings that made them into the powerhouse they are today. I am simply not convinced that the Panthers with their average scoring depth up front, still untested and young D with the exception of Brian Campbell, and mediocre goaltending, that this team is going to make a lot of noise. I simply do not see it. There is a reason why Tallon was relieved of his duties in Chi-town.
So while we mostly agree on things praxitas, our opinions couldn't differ more concerning the subject matter here.