Isn't money the only reason sequels even existed? If the first movie made decent money, then the sequel might make some too.
With so much crappy movies these days (those ____ vampire movies, the latest Adan Sandlers shi*fest,...) I am glad we still have some straight on action movies.
The 80s are full of them (0 plot, mainly driven by star power and generous use of explosives) and yet everyone is looking back at them with rose tinted glasses.
It's been said for almost every sequels but haters can get out of this thread if they despite this movie so much.
I always enjoyed them for what they are and they don't pretend to be anything more than a movie with a pretty star and decent action.
but that is such a Cope out
I hear it every time there is a crappy movie I hear ( is not meant to be citizen Kane) or like you said "is a fun action flick like they did in the 80's
but at least some of those action flicks from the 80's were entertaining and non stop cool action, Resident Evil 4 was Boring, at least 80's movies that didn't have a plot there was someone either getting their ass kicked or someone being shot every so often, RE4, there was some action at the end, but, there was so much pointless talking, so many stupid ideas, the movie kept dragging, I liked the characters, but, the movie took too long on pointless scenes, it just felt boring, I just didn't enjoy it, watching it felt like a chore, like, since I saw the other 3, I might as well just watch the 4th one,
I hate to sound like a hater, I'm not, I will watch this movie, I watched all 4 RE movies, and I like mindless action movies, I just hate when either they have really terrible CGI, or they are boring as hell, or the fights look too fake, like Ultraviolet.
Ill end my rant there, but, yeah mindless dumb action movies are good, they are cool to watch, it just depends, but, some movies are just bad, like RE4