Star Wars: Episode IX - THE RISE OF SKYWALKER
- Thread starter CallMeTheDoctor
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
She would not be a Mary Sue if she was the evil daughter of palptines cloned "son' like she was supposed to be. Nope I will never buy a failed clone raised with out love that has Palpatine DNA would every become good and the Son of Solo/Skywalker raised with love and compassion would become bad because his parents neglected him and his uncle luke tried to kill him in his sleep. Only in a Disney fairy taleOr mary a sue...
I'm so glad that the film itself tells such a different story than that idiotically contradictory book that you hold so high.
Her father's existence doesn't make sense otherwise and you have major age issues to deal with. Palps had no son before he was thrown down that shaft, say he used his half **** to shoot some sperm in a cup and they inseminated it into some poor female and his "son" was born. He would have been two young to have Rey, Rey could not have been that age at the start of the ST its physically impossible. Her father was born at the same age as boba fett he was already a teenage or close to it at birth
I don't agree with a single thing in this post. But no matter, enjoy your KK Story Group Fan Fiction.
When did the movie say palpatine had his "son"? please inform me since I did sleep thru my 2nd viewing, just not my third and I know for a fact it didn't say anything about that. You don't have to reply, I already know the answer they didn't for a reason think about it. Not so you can fill in the blanks with crazy head cannon or maybe that's what they did want. Cause they provided no explanation for anything. The movie was intentionally silent about almost everything to do with Palps return, the clue was the cloned jar of snokessssssssssssssssss. As I said before they probably knew calling his son a clone would piss a lot of people off especially cause they booked rey as his granddaughter and then also changed the Emperor's motivations and plans halfway thru the movie without any explanation either. Maybe you closed your eyes for that scene of the "clone snokes" cause of the sheer horror of how it impacted TLJ. In either case, you are making up **** that wasn't shown in the movie cause they left it vague as **** which is why only like 3 people on here like it- the head cannon wizards. Honestly referring to the novelization is the best thing to do if really want to know what they intended but obviously you don't because it somewhat ruins the movie for you. More power too you keep that head canon but the real canon that's attached to TROS is that the "son' was a clone. Its not made up in anyones minds but those who are directly attached to the movie, Disney and lucas arts all of which approved the additional explanations in the book
Revisionist History 101:
OT = The Luke Saga
PT+OT = The Anakin Saga
PT+OT+ST = The Palpatine Saga
OT = The Luke Saga
PT+OT = The Anakin Saga
PT+OT+ST = The Palpatine Saga
Well the actor who played Rey's father is 30 years old so if the character he was playing was the same age then we know that he was born 30 years prior to the time of Rey's flashback. Look at that, no head canon or crappy contradictory novels required.
Yup the saga switched from skywalker in the OT to Palpatine in the ST, all the dumb skyalkers did was create a monster then adopt another monster that Palps knew about but didn't bother trying to posses or influence her like he did Ben. It would seem trying to corrupt ben would be a lot riskier course of action then focusing on Rey ( an orphan with no parent love or guidance) and with Rey being a Palpatine an all. He knew she existed which is why he sent that bounty hunter guy with the dagger to kill her parents. Why didn't just start messing with her mind instead of bens and just take her then? why risk going for ben when that could have easily failed, and did fail due to Leia and Luke intervening?. Poorly thought out trilogy makes no sense, he didn't even want ben in the end so what was the point. Again making Rey the bad guy and Ben the good guy would have solved a lot of this without unneccesary explanation or destroying OT characters in the process
He was born old like all clones again that's how it all makes sense, you do agree that Palps had no kids during the OT right????????????. The actor's age playing the role has no bearing on the age of the character in the movie. Hell 90210 used 30 year old actors to play high school kids
Advanced Revisionist History:
OT = Organa Trilogy;
PT = Palpatine Trilogy
ST = (Rey) Skywalker Trilogy
And when did the OT tell us that?
Of course not. Why would it. Clearly every character in every movie whose age isn't openly stated on film just sprang into existence as an adult "clone," lol.
The real Actor is 30 years Old.. So I can believe he is playing a 37 or 38 year old. Should not be an issue for anyone who accepts that Ben is whatever age he is supposed to be from Sith to ANH.
That would have gave Palps time for one of his Throne Room Orgies and for some girl to get knocked up and give birth to a son.
Rey's father could have been 30, same as the actor since that scene was a flashback. She was what 5 or 6 in that scene? So if Rey is in her early or mid 20's in TROS and the flashback was from 15-20 years earlier that means Palps' son was sired 15-20 years prior to ROTJ.
Not fast enough with my above answer for ol Khev
Last edited:
Maybe he's a pal of Jeff Goldblum's Grandmaster and he borrowed his spaceship to do the deed lol
Ok then please explain to me when he was born. I asked you not to last time but now I am interested in your story, maybe its better then lucas films and Disney's explanations. But without being confirmed on screen its just a story from you like my "how a few changes could make the st better" stories lol. The clone explanation is verifiable and has reliable references to back it up whereas your fan fic doesnt but I'd still like to hear it
Palps lost her.. He sent someone looking for her but the parent hid her and Palps could not find her as the force was not awoken in her yet.
Why do we have to know when watching the OT that he had a kid.. Kings have all sorts of Bastards because they **** all the time.. Its one of the benefits of being a ruler..
This and this.
Rey's father could have been 30, same as the actor since that scene was a flashback. She was what 5 or 6 in that scene? So if Rey is in her early or mid 20's in TROS and the flashback was from 15-20 years earlier that means Palps' son was sired 20-25 years prior to ROTJ.
Oh yes.. Very true.. My math was way off
Similar threads
