I don't either. But I'm betting Emily Blunt gets it. She's not going to look anything like the comic either unless she gets a boob job and puts on some weight. And for those critisizing ScarJo for not looking athletic enough, let's see how this goes over.
Those idiots'll like it. They like women whose bones scrape during sex.
I don't either. But I'm betting Emily Blunt gets it. She's not going to look anything like the comic either unless she gets a boob job and puts on some weight. And for those critisizing ScarJo for not looking athletic enough, let's see how this goes over.
I don't think either are good choices.
Those idiots'll like it. They like women whose bones scrape during sex.
She isn't bad. I've seen better. I wasn't happy with Hathaway as the Catwoman but she turned out much better than expected.
(these posts reveal a couple of things about both Nam, and Ween lol, interesting)
This post is absolutely biased and contradictory to your own point:
Originally Posted by tylerdurden
LOTR and HP were very specific "fantasy" properties, and different from one another like day is to night. the superhero genre as a whole operates on very basic premises and formulas, such as the origin story (which is ONE example, before any of u go taking this example to task).
As Khev pointed out, which you quite intentionally ignored, Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises couldn't have been further apart in style, mood, story, principle, plot, etc., meaning they match your LOTR and HP description and contradict your biased view on the genre as a whole. But I guess you enjoy living in ignorance.
haha, u just made my day. thanks! being totally predictable, u fell RIGHT into the trap of misquoting me. my post above follows the one u quoted, which clearly stated my position on the differences and SIMILARITIES in genre, specifically the superhero genre. something you conveniently chose to ignore. because ultimately your only recourse against me is to keep sidestepping my point about over-saturation of the genre as a whole.
as much i think marvel has had a smart business plan (also stated an earlier post of mine), the genre AS A WHOLE is starting to suffer, what with all the countless characters being adapted, and all the reboots. we are in a way different era than from the 70s, 80s and 90s. things happen at a much more accelerated pace now. with the omnipresence of the internet, news & updates about movies (including superhero movies) come fast & furious, and the information overload also adds to the feeling of superhero films being everywhere, all the time. granted, most of the stuff is sought out by film geeks, but it does seep through in things like social media where joe public absorbs it.
quality control is also a concern. my worry is for the future --- where warners are planning to reboot batman --- things like that happening. so, add ALL that stuff up and people will eventually get tired. these concerns and opinions of mine (and i never passed them off as cold hard fact) are valid, so it would've been nice if u could respect them. but it is obviously asking too much of u.
anyway, it's been fun, but i've more than made my point by now. so that's all i'll say on this matter. feel free to keep flailing around for more limp attacks. my popcorn's ready, boy!
Nam the Chubby Chaser?
