The Hobbit 48fps/ HIGH FRAME RATE discussion thread.

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'm one of the in-betweeners. But honestly, I don't think I'll go in for 48 again. Kinda weird overall. But I don't like 3D either, and that was the only way to catch the 48 right? At least it was for me. Was planning on seeing it both ways today, but just ran out of time, and couldn't commit to six hours in the theater in one day.

I will see it at 24 soon though... :D
 
Well yeah. But in terms of what is the absolute most visually immersive and impressive experience, that IMAX footage so far for me is heads and shoulders beyond anything else

I can only hope it gets more traction
 
Peter Jackson wants to call it "more immersive", but for me it was the complete opposite. I had trouble focusing on the movie itself because what I was seeing felt "too real". At times I was reminded of those flashback scenes you see in History Channel TV shows.

For me it ruined the illusion of Middle Earth.
 
I completely agree

This might sound ridiculous but the Shire looked like this

article-1385447-00146DB900000258-703_634x578.jpg


What's the point of shooting on location if you're gonna ruin it with HFR :lol
 
Looked fine to me :dunno Just like how I saw it in IMAX but with better colors and much better movement. Didn't need to adjust, either. It's much more natural feeling.
 
No, but earth isn't stuck at 24 FPS either. Maybe my years of gaming at above either of the options has made me not so squeamish.
 
I think HFR will work best for entirely computer generated movies (Pixar etc.) because the creators are in control of every single aspect.

Documentaries may work with HFR.


i guess both of you are right. It might worok well for either fully animated movies or realistic movies with no CGI

My review of the HFR in The Hobbit


I can't say enough about how silly and unnatural the HFR makes certain scenes look. Any shots of Bilbo walking about in the Shire at his home looked absolutely hilariously bad I have to say. Looked super sped up. So too did a LOT of the aerial panning shots, looked like the crane/helicopter was in a bit of a hurry most of the time.

In non-motion heavy scenes the HFR no doubt gives a really great sense of reality and that looking out the window kind of effect, so that's what it's got going for it on the + side. But when things start moving it really is bad. Looks worse than cheap TV films.

you know you would love it if Nolan filmed the Batman movies like this :lol
 
I have a question, so If I want to see the 48 fps I have to watch it in 3D as well right? there is no movie showing 48 fps in 2D?

that makes me wonder if there would be any difference at all and whether it would be better or worst, or the same.
 
Back
Top